Blogging through LOTR: A matter of time

Beside the standing stone Gimli halted and looked up. It was cracked and weather-worn, and the faint runes upon its side could not be read. ‘This pillar marks the spot where Durin first looked in the Mirrormere,’ said the dwarf. ‘Let us look ourselves once, ere we go!’

Happy New Year to you. In this season we think about time, which “like an ever-rolling stream bears all its sons away.” That makes this a good day, I aver, to discuss the question of time in The Lord of the Rings. At least some aspects I’ve noticed.

I’ve been looking for hints of Norse influences in The Fellowship of the Ring, which I’m still reading (almost done now). One such element seems to be the runestone that Gimli visits, shortly after the escape from Moria (excerpt above).

But the stone is illegible, thanks to time and weather. And that got me thinking about time and the concept of ancient things in the Trilogy.

One element I like in these books is that “old” is not confused with evil. As you may recall, I do not love H. P. Lovecraft and his nest of unspeakably evil eldritch gods. There is ancient evil in Tolkien, to be sure, but there’s no hint that wickedness has some kind of precedence over goodness. (This, it seems to me, is an imaginative infection within evolutionism.) Rather, in Tolkien, there’s a sense of a lost golden age, of glories and wonders that shall be seen no more, because the world has declined. This view is much more in harmony with classical mythology, and with the mythologies of many other cultures as well.

C. S. Lewis, in his inaugural lecture at Cambridge, famously noted the fact that, in Beowulf, it is assumed that an old sword is better than a new sword.

I’m not sure if he knew the proximate reason for this fact, which I’ve picked up in my own research. Sword making was state of the art technology in the Dark Ages. But the forging of a sword was as much art as science. Many variables challenged the swordsmith. The bog iron he might be using was capable of producing very fine steel, but impurities were many. The iron contained mineral inclusions which had to be roasted and hammered out, and that process was never perfect. Such inclusions weakened the steel. The forging itself was regulated by eye, by the smith’s judgment of color. If his judgment was off today, the steel might be too brittle, or too soft. Finishing any sword was a gamble, and you never knew until it was completed – and tried in battle – whether the gamble had succeeded or not. That’s why the Norse poem Havamal includes a line saying, “Praise no sword until it is tested.” A fine-looking new weapon might break or permanently bend. An old sword, on the other hand, would have been through many tests and was probably reliable.

But beyond that, Lewis is right that there was a sense – easily understandable in a world that looked back on the glories of Rome – that the present age was an impoverished one, and that we are inferior to our ancestors.

It’s one of Tolkien’s virtues that he recreates that historical frame of mind so well. And it adds atmosphere to the story. The narrative seems all the more realistic, because the characters move in a world equipped with a dimly remembered past.

6 thoughts on “Blogging through LOTR: A matter of time”

  1. “… – that the present age was an impoverished one, and that we are inferior to our ancestors.”

    Here is my trouble with thoughts such as this. When our ancestors were alive, don’t you think there were those who made comments similar to this about their ancestors? Isn’t every age a “present age” in its own time?

    I remember my parents and grandparents making similar comments back in the ’60s and ’70s about a mere generation earlier. And surely some of this is true. A meme floating around on the internet speaks of 18 year olds in 1944 charging the beaches at Normandy while 18 year olds now are looking for safe spaces.

    Btw, I would love to see you flesh out your thoughts about wickedness having precedence over goodness as it relates to evolution.

    Love this blogging through LOTR.

  2. Tangential to your comments, Lars and Greg:

    Isn’t it true that the most horrific evils are often done by future-oriented societies? Nazi Germany and the various Communist societies perceived themselves as aiming at a future glorious state, on behalf of which whole populations should be killed.

    Also: I wonder if the tendency to contrast one’s own time with earlier ones is due, in part (there are other factors), to a vestigial memory, or a tradition, of the prelapsarian world.

    There’s also the recognition that, for the humanities (religion, art, literature, music, etc.), the treasures are in the past. All that we have that’s excellent in these things comes to us from the past, even if that is, sometimes, the recent past. A person who cares about any of the humanities will spend much of his or her time appropriating things from the past.

    Conversely, the will — which is corrupt in Sauron and in us — can be exercised only now, for future advantages, advantages not yet possessed. When the craving sinful will drives us, we are future-oriented.

    These are some quick thoughts on the topic, not testimony submitted in court!

    I like Lars’s topic for this posting. LotR doesn’t just have a better-than-usual-for-a-fantasy-novel sense of the past; the book itself is a way of meditating on the past and on our experience of ourselves as living in time.

  3. From a literary point of view, I think, it’s irrelevant whether the past was superior to the present or not (the plumbing’s certainly better in the present, but plumbing isn’t everything).

    What impressed me was the way in which that sense of a glorious past and its monuments, both physical and cultural, create an impression of plausibility in a an imaginary world.

  4. In the July 3 entry in the Devotional book, Faith Alone
    Luther discusses the issue raised in Ecclesiastes 7:10, “Do not say, ‘Why were the old days better than these?’ For it is not wise to ask such questions.”
    Luther says, “The world has always been filled with troubles, but we haven’t always been aware of them all. When we were children, nothing bothered us. Our lives remained relatively calm. But the world has always been wicked.” His point was that the world doesn’t change as much as our perception of the world changes. We only think the world has gotten worse because as we age we see more of the evil.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.