All posts by Phil

Cooks Source Publisher Regrets Trouble

The publisher of Cooks Source magazine, who also edits and distributes it herself, is sorry for the mess she has caused her publication and advertisers. If the magazine continues, she will be more careful about attributions, but she may need help with copyright law.

She questioned how a chef using a recipe he or she finds online for profit in a restaurant is any different from a magazine publishing one found online. “There’s a big question about recipes,” she said.

This is a bit said, actually. I hope she doesn’t face a lawsuit or huge debt over this, even though she appears to have neglected intellectual copyright entirely. I think the Internet is a mystery to many people who don’t ask if they should do something that their technology allows them to do.

Unforgiving

Look at this outdoor art installation: Work No. 700. From the London museum’s site: “According to the critic Martin Herbert writing about this piece for Art Monthly, ‘There is deep pleasure in this confluence of discipline and forgiveness, the admirable lunge for perfection offset by a recognition that we cannot reach it in real life’.”

Like the recognition that this steel I-beam won’t forgive you for stumping your toe on it. I think this work is better appreciated with a martini or three.

Tips on Writing Better Junk and Stuff

Here’s a hit-n-miss list of writing tips. Number 1: Become a blogger. Eh, I can’t say that’s good advice. I know Lars and I make it look easy by whipping out brilliant, concise posts day after day, but does writing any type of blog make anyone a better writing? I’d think writing at all would have the same benefit.

Number two: Use self-imposed word limits. Now, this is good advice. I’ve been working on 100 words short-shorts for posting here, and the word limit push me to carefully examine otherwise serviceable sentences. I hope I don’t ruin them in the process, but you can let me know once I start putting them up.

Browse the rest of this list to see any of them inspire you.

Fudd, Marvin Reimagined

And now for something completely different. Two dark-side illustrations by Ben Fleuter reimagining two Warner Brothers characters

Wabbit Season



Here’s the Kaboom

One more: A cover image from The St. Canard News

This site has a lot of impressive illustration and photography on anything imaginable as well as unwholesome–no, let’s say perverse–subject matter. So if you choose to browse, be careful.

From another site on this theme, here’s a post on a book Disney has published about their princesses. I love what Maria Elena Naggi did with Belle from Beauty and the Beast. I think she’s my favorite Disney heroine, and this painting suits her perfectly.

"I Caught This Morning Morning’s Minion"

“The Windhover” by Gerard Manley Hopkins is the topic of this podcast, Poetry Off the Shelf, by the Poetry Foundation. It’s a good 11 minutes of poetry discussion, which perhaps you can’t get at the local pub.

Story Problems and Ailments

Douglas Van Belle of Andromeda Spaceways humbly offers “A Comprehensive and Totally Universal Listing of Every Problem a Story Has Ever Had” for your consideration. Things like starting in the wrong place, story pacing, and mundane dialog are only some of his suggested story criticisms.

This leads me to ask when did we begin to believe zombies wanted to eat brains? I remember they come from Voodoo lore, but where was the brain-eating part introduced?

Bless Them Vikings

Learned from a new blog called Evolving English, Old English used the word “hi” or “hie” for third person plural. The vikings changed that around 1200 A.D. “The word ‘they’ was introduced into English by Viking settlers and completely replaced the original Old English word,” according to a language quiz on the British Library’s new language blog. “They” is obviously a better word than “hi.” Who could dispute that?

I scored 4/6 on each difficulty level, which tended to skew toward British English, but I’m not going to complain. No, I’m not.

The Answer is Blowing in the Wind

“The Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) announced on Oct. 21 that it will be ending carbon trading — the only purpose for which it was founded — this year,” reports Steve Milloy. So cap-and-trade is over, though carbon offsets persist. Have you heard or seen this in the news? (via Roy Jacobsen the Beneficent)