
“However,” he said, “if you will not enter the tournament, promise me that you will stay for the banquet afterwards, when there will be some very interesting discourse on love, in which I would be glad to have you join.” “I should be delighted to,” said Sir Henry, “though I do not think I can add anything to the general knowledge on the subject.” “No matter,” said King Anselm, “for no one else knows very much about it anyway.”
Robert Nathan was an eccentric author; I suspect he reveled in that quality. In Sir Henry, first published in 1955, he provides us with a medieval romance – of a sort.
The titular Sir Henry is a middle-aged knight of no great distinction, riding about seeking chivalric adventure on his horse Ponderer, accompanied by his hound Manfred. (Charmingly, the animals talk to one another.) He comes upon a fiery dragon and slays it pretty much by accident. Thereby he frees the dragon’s captive, the lady Alisane, a practical-minded maiden who immediately starts discussing their future home and domesticity.
Further along, they encounter another knight who insists on combat, and Sir Henry slays him as well, again by mischance. This leaves that knight’s companion, the lady Meghan, in his care as well. Sir Henry has a carriage constructed to carry the three of them, and they proceed to various adventures, most of them bloodless.
Alisane is focused on establishing a home. Meghan, on the other hand, is keen for adventure and glory, and finds Sir Henry rather a disappointment. Eventually they do find a home and start constructing a castle, but the upshot of that arrangement will be a total surprise to Sir Henry.
I’ve gotten used to not deriving clear lessons from Robert Nathan’s books (though I think I understand Portrait of Jennie to some extent). Sir Henry is a gentle (and well-crafted) riff on chivalric literature, and also an allegory, with a touch of psychomachia. It’s fun and likeable and bittersweet. I enjoyed it.






