All posts by philwade

George Washington on Unity of Government and Need for Morality

Interwoven as is the love of liberty with every ligament of your hearts, no recommendation of mine is necessary to fortify or confirm the attachment.

Family picnic in woods

The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But as it is easy to foresee that, from different causes and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth; as this is the point in your political fortress against which the batteries of internal and external enemies will be most constantly and actively (though often covertly and insidiously) directed, it is of infinite moment that you should properly estimate the immense value of your national union to your collective and individual happiness; that you should cherish a cordial, habitual, and immovable attachment to it; accustoming yourselves to think and speak of it as of the palladium of your political safety and prosperity; watching for its preservation with jealous anxiety; discountenancing whatever may suggest even a suspicion that it can in any event be abandoned; and indignantly frowning upon the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest, or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link together the various parts.

For this you have every inducement of sympathy and interest. Citizens, by birth or choice, of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections. The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism more than any appellation derived from local discriminations. Continue reading George Washington on Unity of Government and Need for Morality

To All Who Defend Our Country

. . . in times of war and peace, thank you. We owe you deep gratitude for our unique liberty.

Captain America will not let the bad guys pass!

Photo: PowerPee/Flikr

Whether you fought the bad guys or kept watch on our borders, thank you for your service.

west coast avenger

Photo: soyboy7/Flickr

Kagan Supports Book Banning

June 28, 2010 - Washington, District of Columbia, U.S. - U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan begins her confirmation hearing process that will determine if she becomes the next Supreme Court Justice.Capitol Hill - Washington DC 06-28-2010. 2010.I15266CB. © Red Carpet Pictures

Judicial nominee Elena Kagan, presently before the Senate in confirmation hearings, apparently has no problem banning books and other media when the right people want to. You can listen to the audio on the linked post.

The opposition clarifies the issue for us. “Right-wing media are distorting comments Elena Kagan made during arguments before the Supreme Court to falsely claim she said ‘it’s fine if the law bans books.’ In fact, in the video the right is citing, Kagan never said ‘it’s fine if the law bans books’; she specifically argued that federal law had never banned books and likely could not do so.”

That’s so true. I did not hear her say, “It’s fine if the law bans books.” I heard her say that the statute has never been applied to books and no one ever wanted to apply it to books. The Supreme Court Justices make it clear that the law does apply to books, but Kagan argues no one will ever enforce that application.

In other news, Hon. Kagan claims to be an originalist in one sense.

Why Are the Big Books All on One Shelf?

Alastair Harper writes about literary novels being so difficult.

We read books that were clearly quite brilliant, if only we could understand them. They might, as we never admitted to each other, baffle us now, but hopefully we’d come out the other side stronger, better people for the experience. Maybe one day we’d even impress some girls.

He closes the article asking for recommendations and warnings on difficult book. Which ones are worthwhile; which ones are worthless?

Relying Not on Ourselves

2 Corinthians 8-10 ESV–For we do not want you to be ignorant, brothers, of the affliction we experienced in Asia. For we were so utterly burdened beyond our strength that we despaired of life itself. Indeed, we felt that we had received the sentence of death. But that was to make us rely not on ourselves but on God who raises the dead. He delivered us from such a deadly peril, and he will deliver us. On him we have set our hope that he will deliver us again.

I’ve been praying during the night for a few people who would identify with Paul’s suffering, but beyond that the applications are legion, aren’t they? Self-serving officials, the mess in the gulf (now being called a dead zone), crime in our cities, conflict in our families, illnesses or injustices or simple unemployment among our friends and acquaintances. No matter what the next step may be for one of these problems, it is to make us rely not on ourselves but on God who raises the dead. He is all-sufficient, merciful, and righteous.

Is Some Art Too Complicated?

Complication is not the same as complexity. There are many complex works–novels, paintings, musical compositions–which are not easy to comprehend, but rich and enjoyable to work with. Like the stuff Loren Eaton writes: I mean at first you’re like Wuh?! and then you’re like Dude!! and then you’re like Whoa! That’s where it is.

Terry Teachout talks about art complicatedness in the wake of James Joyce and Bloomsday. “Are our brains simply not big enough to process the prose of Joyce or the music of Boulez?” he asks. “And if not, then why have such similarly complex artistic creations as the drip paintings of Jackson Pollock succeeded in finding an appreciative popular audience?”

Painter Jackson Pollock, cigarette in mouth, dropping paint onto canvas.  (Photo by Martha Holmes//Time Life Pictures/Getty Images)

Locus Awards for Sci-fi, New Pratchett Prize

The winners of the 2010 Locus Awards have been announced. Winner of best fantasy novel is this metaphysical mystery by London author China Miéville:

The best science fiction novel is this steampunk tale called, Boneshaker, by Cherie Priest, who earned her college degrees in my part of the world (I just learned).

Also of note: there’s a new contest for new novelists of the U.K. and Ireland. It’s The Terry Pratchett Anywhere But Here, Anywhen But Now Prize. Wild acclaim and fortune will attend the winners of this soon-to-be prestigious honor.

Interview with a Legal Ukrainian Immigrant

“It’s so hard to watch these Americans, who have so much, toss it away by voting for imbeciles. I am American now and these people have no idea how good they have it.” Kevin Jackson posts an conversation he had with a Ukrainian businesswoman who was a Republican, because she knew where liberal ideas led.

Revisiting a Classic on It's 50th Anniversary

What ‘To Kill a Mockingbird’ Isn’t

Allen Barra writes, “Georgia had Flannery O’Connor and Carson McCullers; Mississippi had William Faulkner and Eudora Welty; Louisiana inspired the major works of Kate Chopin and Tennessee Williams. Alabama had. . . Well, while Zora Neale Hurston and Walker Percy were born in Alabama, those two great writers didn’t stick around my home state for long. And as for Harper Lee—Alabama born, raised and still resident—she doesn’t really measure up to the others in literary talent, but we like to pretend she does.”