Having Eyes See Not

James Taranto points out a report, not widely touted by the establishment press, of grisly torture by our enemies in Iraq. If you follow the links, you’ll see descriptions of evil deeds like those portrayed for entertainment in the movie Hostel and reports of men freed by our troops. Yet on this Memorial Day weekend, we get no above-the-fold coverage on this, no evidence for the reason Mr. Bush called them evil.

Patrick Henry’s words about another American conflict seem to fit, and on this weekend, I recommend them in honor of those who have given their lives in defense of our freedom and their own families.

For my own part, I consider it as nothing less than a question of freedom or slavery; and in proportion to the magnitude of the subject ought to be the freedom of the debate. It is only in this way that we can hope to arrive at truth, and fulfill the great responsibility which we hold to God and our country. . . .

Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren, till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we disposed to be of the number of those, who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide for it. . . .

If we wish to be free—if we mean to preserve inviolate those inestimable privileges for which we have been so long contending—if we mean not basely to abandon the noble struggle in which we have been so long engaged, and which we have pledged ourselves never to abandon, until the glorious object of our contest shall be obtained—we must fight! I repeat it, sir, we must fight! An appeal to arms and to the God of Hosts is all that is left us!

0 thoughts on “Having Eyes See Not”

  1. Hostel…

    I’m wondering if some of the vile stuff we wallow in as entertainment isn’t being cycled back to us as news with our guys as the victims.

  2. In this case, I doubt it, but in general, I think violence movies, images, and stories feed off of the news of violent acts from those feeding off of their own and other’s violent imaginations. It’s cyclical, like recycling.

    But you can take the influence of others out, because evil deeds don’t need outside influence. It’s natural to punch your enemy or do hateful things to the weak one disdains. When you have power over others, you have to have strong principles and morals to avoid harming them. Seeing everyone as part of God’s image or as valuable in themselves guards us against hating them instead of hating their deeds.

    I confess I have trouble understanding the real difference between rejecting the deeds of a person and rejecting the person. I do understand it, but somehow I don’t.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.