All posts by Phil

Don’t Have One; Don’t Do It

P.J. O’Rourke discusses the new deadly sins and lists some of his own:

Opinion. It’s the reverse of fact. Listen to NPR or AM Talk Radio if you don’t believe me, or, better yet, read the opinion page of the New York Times. (I’m talking about you, Paul Krugman.) Some people have facts, these can be proven. Some people have theories, these can be disproven. But people with opinions are mindless and have their minds made up about it. The 11th Commandment is, “Thou shalt not blog.”

Now the question is how can I be forgiven? (via World on the Web)

Walking Out

Ann Althouse asks what movies you have walked out on. I rarely see movies in a theater, so I don’t have much opportunity to walk out, but my wife and I did eject a Doris Day DVD a while back. Caprice is a spy comedy, and I had read about its complicated plot, so I was open to subtleties and a bit of confusion. Still the light but constant sexual humor (mild compared to what’s available today) was not enjoyable.

Dissing Stein and Missing the Point

Elsewhere on Britannica’s blog some folks are criticizing Ben Stein’s movie, Expelled, in context of an essay Stein wrote for the Expelled website. Robert McHenry writes:

“Darwinism . . . is a perfect example of the age from which it came: the age of Imperialism” [Stein says.]

And therefore . . . Well, he doesn’t say. This is called an enthymeme, or a rhetorical syllogism. The idea is that the conclusion gains force from seeming to occur spontaneously to the reader. This is the sort of thing that gives rhetoric a bad name.

But why isn’t “Darwinism” offered as a perfect example of, say, the Victorian Age? Or of the Steam Age? Or the Age of the Clipper Ship? Is it possible that Stein is loading the argument just a tad?

A little bit later he tells us that “Imperialism had a short but hideous history – of repression and murder.” He seems to think that the British, and specifically the Victorians, invented imperialism. This idea would surprise the Incas and the Arabs and the Spanish and the Portuguese, among others around the world. He seems also to believe that the results of European imperialism were uniformly terrible. Some were, some were not.

Somehow, I think McHenry is missing the point. Between the first quote and the second, Stein explains the therefore McHenry asks for. Stein writes:

But it fell to a true Imperialist, from a wealthy British family on both sides, married to a wealthy British woman, writing at the height of Imperialism in the UK, when a huge hunk of Africa and Asia was “owned” (literally, owned, by Great Britain) to create a scientific theory that rationalized Imperialism. By explaining that Imperialism worked from the level of the most modest organic life up to man, and that in every organic situation, the strong dominated the weak and eventually wiped them out, Darwin offered the most compelling argument yet for Imperialism. It was neither good nor bad, neither Liberal nor Conservative, but simply a fact of nature. In dominating Africa and Asia, Britain was simply acting in accordance with the dictates of life itself.

There’s a long comment thread after both essays.

Folks Still Read

Writers on Britannica’s blog are still talking about newspapers, and Colette Bancroft says Internet readers aren’t as shallow as some make them out to be.

People use the Net for a lot of silly things, but they also make serious use of it (here you are reading an encyclopedia’s blog). Remember all the dire warnings back in the ‘90s that the Net meant the death of reading? So, what do people do online? Many things, but mostly, they read. And they write. Boy, do they write. In blogs and forums and chat rooms, they pour out the words.

She goes on to mention rising interest in books and declining book coverage in newspapers.

Disney Is Kicking Up Production

Over the next four years, Disney plans to release 10 animated movies, 8 of which will be in digital 3-D. Coming up will be two princess movies, two sequels to Pixar films, what looks like an Underdog take-off, and one based on a Phillip K. Dick story.

Tags: , ,

Distracted

Chattanooga Matters (formerly the Chattanooga Resource Foundation) has a seminar from earlier this year with John Stonestreet of Bryan College on YouTube. It’s a nine part video series, and in this part, John makes a great statement. “In my view the worst thing about contemporary entertainment . . . [is that] it makes us think about things that aren’t important and keeps us from thinking about things that are. It distracts us from the real world. We are a distracted generation.”

Literature and Writing Conferences

Calvin College’s Festival of Faith & Writing is coming next week, April 17-19, in more or less beautiful Grand Rapids, Michigan. That’s quite a drive from where I live, but even further is the C.S. Lewis Foundation’s Oxbridge conference at the end of July in Oxford and Cambridge, England. That would be an experience.