Category Archives: Religion

You’d better watch out



The Council of Nicea. I think St. Nicholas is the bald guy with the book on the right. Photo credit: Hispalois.

Our friend Dr. Paul McCain of Cyberbrethren quotes another friend of ours, Dr. Gene Edward Veith today, reprinting his classic account of Saint Nicholas (whose feast day is today) slapping the heretic Arius.

During the Council of Nicea, jolly old St. Nicholas got so fed up with Arius, who taught that Jesus was just a man, that he walked up and slapped him! That unbishoplike behavior got him in trouble. The council almost stripped him of his office, but Nicholas said he was sorry, so he was forgiven.

Dr. Veith goes on to make some constructive suggestions concerning new Christmas slapping customs we might adopt.

[Update: Due to the ever changing flow of the Internet, Cyberbrethren is no more. Here’s an updated article from Veith at The Lutheran Witness. Here’s an even more recent post referring to this article on Veith’s own blog.]

Thanksgiving 2013



“Home to Thanksgiving” by Currier & Ives, 1867

“He who sits by the fire, thankless for the fire, is just as if he had no fire. Nothing is possessed save in appreciation, of which thankfulness is the indispensable ingredient.” (W.J. Cameron)

I’ve used that quotation for Thanksgiving before, but it was a long time ago. On the old web site, I think. Anyway, I like it.

It occurred to me today how closely thankfulness is connected to faith. One of the most common hindrances to faith—at least in my experience—is worry about the future. “Things are all right just now,” I say to myself, “but what about tomorrow? Being thankful feels too much like complacency. I have to keep my eye out for what’s coming down the road.”

This is one reason, I suppose, why Jesus tells us to cast no thought upon the morrow. Worry kills thankfulness, and lack of thankfulness destroys our spiritual perspective.

So have a blessed Thanksgiving. I hope you spend it with people you love. Or, alternatively, that you love the people you’re spending it with.

50 years gone



C. S. Lewis’ grave in Holy Trinity churchyard, Headington Quarry, Oxford

Photo credit: jschroe

I’m going to alter my long-established custom of always posting about a days’ commemorations in the evening of that day, which means most of you read it the next day. Tomorrow is the fiftieth anniversary of the death of C. S. Lewis (also of a couple obscure characters named John F. Kennedy and Aldous Huxley).

I was, of course, around when it happened, in junior high if you must know. What did I think when I heard Lewis was dead? I’m not sure, because I wasn’t aware of his death date until years later, long after I’d become a Lewis enthusiast. I do remember the day though, because of the Kennedy thing.

But I’ve written about that before. I’d like to just recall what Lewis has meant in my life. It occurred to me today that Lewis was himself my Wardrobe, the portal through which I entered a larger world.

I was educated, like most of my friends, in Lutheran colleges which are now under the umbrella of The Very Large Lutheran Church Body Which Shall Remain Nameless. But, unlike a large percentage of my friends from those days, I neither apostatized or became a liberal. It was Lewis who made that possible (with the help at a later stage of Francis Schaeffer). The Lutheran schools I’m speaking of had then, and I assume still have, one single purpose in their religious education curricula, and that is to destroy all Christian faith in their students. But Lewis (though no biblical inerrantist) showed me that embracing orthodox Christianity doesn’t mean giving up reason. I clung to reason, and I clung to the faith of my childhood.

You yourself may approve or disapprove of that course on my part, but as for me, it’s one of the things I’m thankful for as Thanksgiving approaches.

91 New Theses Opposing Modern Heresy

Earlier this year, I was going over Martin Luther’s 95 theses, and it occurred to me that many of them apply to the teachings we call the prosperity gospel. The comparison isn’t exact, of course. Prosperity teachers may be popular, but they aren’t part of the majority church as were the teachers Luther opposed. And if you remember from reading Luther’s list, he gives the Pope all due respect, suggesting that he is being misrepresented, not that he is teaching heresy himself. We can’t say that for the preachers of the prosperity gospel.

Here’s my list, taken from and based on Luther’s original–and four theses short. You see today’s Wittenberg doors on the InterWebs. They’re bronze, so we’ll have to post new theses with sticky tack. You’ll also see that several of the theses here are Luther’s own statements, taken from this translation.

No doubt, the spirit of Luther will pull me out of bed tonight, knock me in the head, and rebuke me until daybreak for pulling this stunt. I hope it doesn’t offend you and bore only some of you. Hope you continue to have a good and holy All Saint’s Day.

91 New Theses for the Modern Church

  1. When our Lord and Master, Jesus Christ, said “Repent”, He called for the entire life of believers to be one of repentance.
  2. The word cannot be properly understood as referring to living your best life now, i.e. positive thinking, as taught by some preachers.
  3. Yet its meaning is not restricted to repentance in one’s heart; for such repentance is null unless it produces outward signs in various mortifications of the flesh.
  4. As long as hatred of sinful self abides (i.e. true inward repentance) the penalty of sin abides, viz., until we enter the kingdom of heaven.
  5. Preachers of “kingdom prosperity” have neither the will nor the power to remit the penalty of sin.
  6. They cannot remit guilt, but only ignore or excuse it because original sin and Christ’s atoning work are not in their view.
  7. God never remits guilt to anyone without, at the same time, making him humbly submissive to Christ.
  8. The promises of God apply only to followers of Christ Jesus, those who have been raised to life from a spiritual stillbirth.
  9. Mere fandom for a church or preacher does not qualify anyone to be particularly blessed by the Lord of Hosts.
  10. It is a wrongful act, due to ignorance, when mere fans of a church claim statements from the Word of God as particular promises for their personal lives.
  11. When preachers encourage their followers to claim particular promises, instead of repentance, surely it would seem that tares were sown among their congregations.
  12. These preachers ignore the natural consequences of sin in this world, i.e. suffering both mild and severe.
  13. Death is the result of sin, both physical and spiritual. All of our worldly sufferings are steps on this primrose path.
  14. The Shepherd has promised to walk with His flock through the valley of the shadow of death, not completely spare them from it.
  15. Our struggle with fearing the Lord is our natural tension between trusting Him and trusting ourselves.
  16. Faith is trusting the Lord for what we cannot see and test for ourselves.
  17. The Lord does not spare us from the fleshly pain of walking where we cannot see.
  18. Scripture gives us grounds to understand that believers will suffer pain in such a way as to rely on the Lord’s grace to be able to persevere.
  19. Therefore, Scripture does not teach that God intends for His followers to increase in prosperity and health throughout their earthly lives.
  20. Moreover, Scripture does not teach that God intends for this prosperity to increase while His followers can maintain their faith with absolute confidence.
  21. Faith is a gift of the Lord.
  22. Indeed, His eternal power guards the faith of His people through Christ until the end.
  23. If our faith must be absolutely confident, without the slightest taint of human doubt, in order to move the Lord’s hand, then Christ would not have blessed the man who begged Him to help his unbelief.
  24. Moreover, we love God only because He loved us first, before the manifestation of our faith.
  25. It must therefore be that many people are deceived by that indiscriminate and high-sounding promise of worldly prosperity and health.
  26. Preachers have no divine authority to declare statements or phrases from the Word of God as particular promises for their congregations.
  27. It is certainly possible that when the money clinks in the hands of these ministers avarice and greed increase; but when the church offers intercession, all depends in the will of God.
  28. If these preachers had such authority, why do they not claim such promises on behalf of their congregations?
  29. Why do those who proclaim the kingdom prosperity of the Lord not use their own faith to bring down God’s blessing on everyone within their hearing?
  30. The teaching of God’s preferential treatment in this way denies the doctrine of humility.
  31. Indeed, many of Solomon’s proverbs commend to us righteous poverty over worldly wealth.
  32. Christ Himself taught that the rich would find difficulty entering the kingdom of heaven because of the entanglements of their wealth.
  33. We should be most carefully on our guard against those who say God intends His followers to increase in the wealth that entangles.
  34. For the favor conveyed by this prosperity is merely that which relates simply to favor of man.
  35. Scripture speaks equally of the prosperity of the righteous and the wicked.
  36. When the latter is in view, God instructs His people to remember the final judgment which comes from His righteous throne.
  37. No true wealth will be destroyed with the end of the age, so the false wealth of the wicked will burn up in time, but the true wealth of the righteous will endure forever.
  38. It is not in accordance with Christian doctrines to preach and teach that those who “enlarge their vision” of God’s favor can speak material prosperity into existence.
  39. Any Christian whatsoever, who is truly repentant, enjoys the favor of God and can be spiritual wealthy without the entanglements of riches.
  40. Any true Christian whatsoever, living or dead, participates in all the benefits of Christ and the Church; and this participation is granted to him by God on account of Christ’s atonement for him.
  41. If these preachers would extol their followers to speak and think positively, let them extol the virtues of hoping in Christ.
  42. If they would teach their followers that they will become what they believe, let them extol the humble character of Christ.
  43. If they would teach that the glory of God is on believers, let them find that glory in Christ on the cross.
  44. For if anyone would know their destiny in Christ, it is to take up their cross and follow Him.
  45. Christ Himself rejected the temptation to become king without suffering on the cross.
  46. A truly contrite and humble believer seeks and loves his Lord despite physical or worldly difficulties; whereas the very multitude of prosperity teaching dulls men’s consciences and tends to make them self-righteous.
  47. Christians should be taught that no exercise of faith for personal success or comfort is at all comparable with the works of mercy and love.
  48. Christians should be taught that one who gives to the poor, or lends to the needy, does a better action than if he gives to these preachers who promise a greater financial return.
  49. Because, by works of love, love grows and a man becomes a better man.
  50. Christians should be taught that he who sees a needy person, but passes him by although he gives money to these prosperity ministries, gains no spiritual benefit, but only incurs the wrath of God.
  51. Christians should be taught that, unless they have more than they need, they are bound to retain what is only necessary for the upkeep of their home, and should in no way squander it on the promises of greater return.
  52. Christians should be taught that the faith our Lord requires is exercised in humility and love.
  53. For Christ humbled Himself, disregarding the glory of God that was His, and in becoming man, obeyed the Father unto death on the cross.
  54. Christians should be taught that salvation is to be found in humble reliance on Christ and not on the strength of personal faith or financial success.
  55. It is vain to rely on words spoken in faith by believers more than on the grace of Almighty God.
  56. Christians should be taught that the Lord’s favor is first in great spiritual wealth, second in worldly wealth. The first is assured; the second is of the Lord’s discretion.
  57. Moreover, Christians should be taught that the Lord leads us through difficulties, e.g. poverty, etc., for our purity and to develop a reliance on Him.
  58. No claim made by even the most sincere believer will supplant the mind of God.
  59. If that were not so, then St. Paul would not have learned contentment in want, but only in plenty, and he would have delivered himself from prison with the power of his own faith.
  60. St. Paul would not have lost a ll things in order to gain Christ and be found in Him, because that would not have been God’s prosperous destiny for him, as taught by some.
Rembrandt St. Paul in Prison (1627, Stuttgart)
St. Paul in Prison, Rembrandt, 1627
  1. Those are enemies of Christ and His church who ignore the Word of God in favor of proclaiming power in personal faith.
  2. Those are enemies of Christ who teach proclaiming faith more than in Christ’s redeeming work.
  3. When God said, “My grace is sufficient for thee,” He intended all believers to find their greatest fulfillment in His benevolence.
  4. No true teacher of the word of God would proclaim the power of human faith over the sufficiency of Christ.
  5. The merits of Christ are always working grace in the inner man, and working the cross, death, and hell in the outer man.
  6. When Christ said the kingdom of heaven is for those who would become like children, He intended for all believers to live the rich life of the humble servant.
  7. St. Laurence said that the poor were the treasures of the church, but he used the term in accordance with the custom of his own time.
  8. We do not speak rashly in saying that the treasures of the church are the keys of the church and are bestowed by the merits of Christ.
  9. Indeed, to teach the treasures of kingdom prosperity is to teach a modern indulgence of greed, lust, and covetousness.
  10. The true treasure of the church is the Holy gospel of the glory and the grace of God.
  11. It is right to regard this treasure as most odious, for it makes the first to be the last.
  12. On the other hand, the treasure of “kingdom prosperity” is most acceptable, for it makes the last to be the first.
  13. Therefore the treasures of the gospel are nets which, in former times, they used to fish for men of wealth.
  14. The treasures of the modern indulgences are the nets which today they use to fish for the wealth of men.
  15. The indulgences, which the merchants extol as the greatest of favors, are seen to be, in fact, a favorite means for money-getting.
  16. Nevertheless, they are not to be compared with the grace of God and the compassion shown in the Cross.
  17. Booksellers and publishers, who profess to uphold Christ in their publications, are under great obligation to watch closely and attend carefully these teachers of their own fancies instead of the gospel.
  18. Christian publishers rightly reject any proposals from the peddlers of these modern indulgences.
  19. These peddlers are not ministers of the gospel, but prey on the poor and ignorant with high-sounding words.
  20. They teach that giving will protect them from the devourer, but they are devourers of their own followers.
  21. They repeat the words of Job’s accusers as if they came from St. Peter. They say, “Agree with God,” but misstate what God affirms.
  22. We assert the contrary, and say that the riches of Christ in the inner man is a greater wealth than anyone could gain on earth.
  23. Again: When Scripture says, “Better is a little with righteousness,” it means that some of the righteous will live in poverty, at least for a season. This is no particular curse from God, but the original curse placed on the world by sin.
  24. We affirm that God does bless with material wealth, but this is secondary to the profound wealth given to us in Christ.
  25. Christians are heirs with Christ to an eternal inheritance which moth and rust cannot destroy, like the destruction coming for the riches of earth.
  26. The riches of God’s glory are to be found in Christ, who will strengthen the inner man with his Spirit through faith.
  27. Therefore, true kingdom prosperity is not of this world, just as our Lord said His kingdom was not of this world.
  28. Away, then, with those prophets who say to Christ’s people, “Peace, peace,” where there is no peace.
  29. Hail, hail to all those prophets who say to Christ’s people, “The cross, the cross,” where there is no cross.
  30. Christians should be exhorted to be zealous to follow Christ, their Head, through penalties, deaths, and hells.
  31. And let them thus be more confident of entering heaven through many tribulations rather than through a false assurance of peace.

The Reformation in LEGO

I’ve been playing with the kids today and working on theology piece which I hope to post here soon, so while it’s still Reformation Day, let me direct you to this recreation of Luther’s Reformation acts in !!eye-poppingly realistic!! LEGO form. You will believe you are actually in Germany with these events went down.

Luther's Rose - Happy Reformation Sunday!

Something rotten in Sweden

Someone posted this on Facebook this morning, and I re-posted it there, because it epitomizes everything I’ve been saying about the course of liberal Christianity. A new archbishop has been elected for the Church of Sweden – its first woman archbishop, Antje Jackelén. At another time I might have had something to say about women’s ordination, but that issue is least of the problems here. Dispatch-International’s story says:

Like kings, all bishops have their own motto and Jackelén chose ”God is greater”. If that sounds familiar, it may be due to the fact that an Arabic translation renders it as ”Allahu akbar”. There are those who believe that her choice is far from random – but very deliberate.

Many have been taken aback by the theological opinions Jackelén revealed during a questioning in Uppsala on October 1. The candidates for the highest position in the Swedish church were asked if they thought Jesus presented a truer picture of God than Muhammed. With her evasive answer Jackelén suddenly emerged as the bishop who couldn’t choose between Jesus and Muhammed. This provoked strong reactions on some editorial pages.

Kyrkans Tidning thought that the bishop’s answer might indicate that Christ is being relegated to the margins of the Church of Sweden and Dagens Nyheter encouraged the candidates to show some theological backbone. The editorial writer at the newspaper Dagen wrote that it is time to accept the idea of a split within the church – between Christians and those who think all religions are equally good.

Now let me say that this article seems just a little sensationalist to me. Its title, “Swedish Archbishop Prefers Allah,” for instance, is an exaggeration of the actual content of the text. Judging by this account, Archbishop Jackelén hasn’t said she prefers Allah to Jesus. She just refuses to make the choice.

I am fairly certain that, in the historical Christian church at all times up till the 20th Century, one thing that would always have disqualified any candidate for a bishopric is a refusal to confess Jesus Christ as Lord. That’s just basic, like failing an eye test for an airline pilot.

Which means that, as far as I can see, the Swedish church has apostasized in electing this woman. Anyone who holds to the faith of the creeds ought to leave that church. At a full run.

And don’t think it’s not happening here. I am confident, on the basis of a lifetime working in churches both liberal and conservative, that there are many church leaders and seminary professors in America (Ms. Jackelén in fact taught at the Lutheran seminary at the University of Chicago for a time) who believe – or disbelieve – in pretty much the same way.

At the risk of sounding like somebody from Left Behind, I declare ours the day of the Great Apostasy.

Neglecting the Ministry of the Word

Al Mohler writes:

Indeed, in many churches there is very little reading of the Bible in worship, and sermons are marked by attention to the congregation’s concerns, not by an adequate attention to the biblical text. The exposition of the Bible has given way to the concerns, real or perceived, of the listeners. The authority of the Bible is swallowed up in the imposed authority of congregational concerns.

(via Jared C. Wilson)

"Osteenian"

Today I got an e-mail from super-author Andrew Klavan, directing me to this column on his blog, in which he gives me a nice plug.

Novelist Lars Walker — a friend of this blog and an insightful reviewer of some of my own novels — makes a trenchant comment in the Elizabeth Smart post below. I know it’s trenchant because I was about to make basically the same comment but Lars beat me to it! In the comment, he makes a delightfully concise reference to “the Osteenian view that suffering is always a sign of God’s displeasure.” This, of course, refers to popular preacher Joel Osteen, who has been promoting his new book at the Blaze and other places. He basically preaches that God wants wonderful things for your life and you only have to open yourself to God’s will in order to receive those blessings.

He was particularly pleased, he said, by my use of the adjective “Osteenian,” meaning theological ideas in line with Joel Osteen’s preaching. He seems to think I may have coined it, though I find it hard to believe nobody’s used it before.

In any case, this counts as a good day.

I, bully

News item: This story from CBS Dallas-Fort Worth seems to have surprised a lot of people. But I suspect there were a lot of us for whom it was no surprise at all. The story has to do with a study done at the University of Texas, Arlington which indicates that anti-bullying programs in schools don’t seem to do any good, and indeed may do harm.

The student videos used in many campaigns show examples of bullying and how to intervene. But Jeong says they may actually teach students different bullying techniques — and even educate about new ways to bully through social media and texting.

This is what happens in a post-Wisdom world, where experts have replaced sages, grandmothers, and the Scriptures. Experts believe that children are basically good, and desire to learn how to avoid bullying. Those of us who are familiar with actual children know that the true situation is different. You can’t divide kids up into “bullies” and “victims.” The categories are fluid. Every kid has it in him to bully, by the same kind of instinct which causes chickens to single out a member of the flock who’s been wounded, and peck it to death.

I’ve spoken of being bullied here before. I was bullied a lot, both at home and at school. There were few safe places in my world.

But I was also a bully, now and then, when fate chose to make me the alpha dog in some tiny situation. I never even thought about it. It came naturally. Today I’m hotly ashamed of those incidents, but at the time it just seemed like the obvious thing to do.

We won’t make progress until we recognize human nature for what it is. And we won’t do that until we start reading the Bible seriously again.