0 thoughts on “Solzhenitsyn: Non-person”

  1. I don’t want to say it, but that article is a bit difficult. I tend to think that poor readers are poor thinkers, so they will glaze over while reading literary jargon and understand nothing. They may read a Solzhenitsyn short story and gain a little something, but I doubt it will be the anthology editor’s intent or message that they will gain.

  2. Worth-noting it is, and thank you. I didn’t mean to suggest it isn’t or that the article’s conclusion isn’t true either. But I’m starting to respond to viewpoints which seem more reactionary than thoughtful.

    On Ori’s point, I think the only influence those profs have is when their worldview trickles down to others, and I doubt it usually trickles far at all.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.