While we waited for Jan, Brian asked me about Ena and the children. I had seen them the day before; Sunday: the day of the child, the new agnostic sabbath when all over the western world diffident fathers turned up to catch a glimpse of the only things they still believed in from their marriage. They brought gifts of ill-fitting clothes and books that would never be read and membership-cards for leisure centres.

Usually, when a writer is expressly liberal in his opinions, I’ll drop him quietly, because we’re just not compatible. But I enjoyed William McIlvanney’s Strange Loyalties too much to do that. I may even spring for the previous two books in this series. This novel was written back in the 1970s, and the liberalism expressed is similar to the naïve kind I myself espoused back in those days. McIlvanney is remembered as a founding father of the “Tartan Noir” school of detective writing, but I doubt very much that any of his successors ever surpassed him. This is a bona fide work of literature, genre or not.

Jack Laidlaw is a Glasgow detective. In the honorable tradition of hard-boiled policemen’s lives, his is going to pieces. He’s divorced, and his relationship with his new girlfriend is on the rocks. When his brother Scott is hit by a car and killed in their home town, Jack is gripped by an existential compulsion – he needs to know why. The death isn’t legally suspicious – the driver was with his family, and Scott was unquestionably drunk. But why had Scott’s life gone awry in the first place? Once he was a talented artist with a bright future, but somehow he’d lost his reason for living.

The investigation will lead to Scott’s ex-wife and her social circle, and to his old friends. Jack will uncover corruption, which will tie in with a case his partners are working on back in Glasgow. And he will learn, in the end, his brother’s dark secret.

First of all, I have to say that the prose in Strange Loyalties was as good as I’ve ever read. Anywhere. McIlvanney was a brilliant stylist. Great lines abound: “A kitchen in the morning: it can be a garden of the senses. The sunlight is shafting in through the window, as if William Blake had been given the commission today and is announcing the sacredness of everyday.” “There are few sounds more forlorn than the phone of someone you love ringing out with no one to answer.”

Also (and maybe this is a function of the cultural period), even though there’s plenty of darkness and cynicism in this book, it wasn’t nihilistic. There were hopeful moments. There was even an obscure biblical reference, a mention of the “Rechabites.” (But that was also the name of a temperance society, so maybe it was they the author had in mind.)

I relished Strange Loyalties. It was as smooth as top-shelf, single malt whisky (not that I’ve ever tasted that). Highly recommended.