And now for something completely different: two diplomats discussing a territory disagreement.
And now for something completely different: two diplomats discussing a territory disagreement.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
We respect your privacy. Would you like to accept some freshly baked cookies?
Websites store cookies to enhance functionality and personalise your experience. You can manage your preferences, but blocking some cookies may impact site performance and services.
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
These cookies are used for managing login functionality on this website.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
Marketing cookies are used to follow visitors to websites. The intention is to show ads that are relevant and engaging to the individual user.
A video-sharing platform for users to upload, view, and share videos across various genres and topics.
Service URL: www.youtube.com (opens in a new window)
One of those diplomats is acting as an aggressor by defending himself. Unfortunately it’s difficult to tell which one it is. No doubt the New York Times will clarify the matter.
That is definitely the old school way of settling things. Those were the days.
Perhaps the victor should have been hired to supervise the recount.