The Guardian has the most recent interview with the great writer and speaker Christopher Hitchens, who is suffering from cancer. In talking about his atheist efforts and others doing the same cuddly work:
Nonetheless, Hitchens mentions a “narrow but quite deep difference” between himself and Dawkins. Unlike the evangelical biologist, he has no wish to convert everyone in the world to his point of view, even if it were possible. In other words, he savours the counterargument. Like John Stuart Mill, he is aware of the empty end of achieved objectives. The true satisfaction lies in the means. Although Hitchens is often seen as a provocateur or a contrarian, and both are indeed aspects of his character, at heart he’s incurably in love with the dialectic.
(via The Daily Caller)
He has written an interesting autobiography (“Hitch,” I think)–it’s worth while checking out to see where he is coming from.
Hitch-22: A Memoir
I’m sure it’s an interesting book. He’s a very interesting man, even if he can argue you into a whole in support of the wrong point. Heh.
Dawkins is a nihilist, Hitchens a romantic. One wants to take while the other wants to give.
“Dawkins is a nihilist, Hitchens a romantic.”
Good quote.