George Grant passes on an irony with some Chesterton fans.
George Grant passes on an irony with some Chesterton fans.
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
We respect your privacy. Would you like to accept some freshly baked cookies?
Websites store cookies to enhance functionality and personalise your experience. You can manage your preferences, but blocking some cookies may impact site performance and services.
Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the proper function of the website.
These cookies are needed for adding comments on this website.
These cookies are used for managing login functionality on this website.
Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us understand how visitors use our website.
Google Analytics is a powerful tool that tracks and analyzes website traffic for informed marketing decisions.
Service URL: policies.google.com (opens in a new window)
Marketing cookies are used to follow visitors to websites. The intention is to show ads that are relevant and engaging to the individual user.
A video-sharing platform for users to upload, view, and share videos across various genres and topics.
Service URL: www.youtube.com (opens in a new window)
I have less problems with Chesterton’s Catholicism (I’m a Lutheran, after all) than with his frequent outbreaks of appalling, pig-ignorant anti-Semitism.
And yet I love him.
“We have this treasure in earthen vessels.”
Anti-Semitism? What the heck? I don’t understand that particular tendency in some of our great thinkers. Augustine had it too, as I understand. Was it a cultural attitude they did not examine?
Chesterton’s anti-Semitism should be distinguished from the later, Nazi kind. It had nothing to do with race, but with the idea (common in the politically radical groups the young Chesterton frequented) that the “hidden hand” of the Jews controlled world banking, and that the governments had sold out to them, etc. You hear much the same thing today, and tragically, it’s regaining some respectability. Read “The Man Who Knew Too Much” (if you can find it) and shudder.
I’m aghast at times at the outrageous things Chesterton says about those ‘damned calvinists’ but I too forgive him. (He’s so much fun you have to.)
– Along these lines I recommend an essay by James Schall ‘The enemies of the man who had no enemies’
http://www.georgetown.edu/faculty/schallj/3.htm#purpose
– scroll down the page a bit.
– if we want to go easy on him I guess we could point to the fact a lot of what he wrote was done quickly in a rush to meet a deadline. (As he says in his introduction to ‘All things considered’ where he apologizes that so many of the essays are serious… he had no time to make them humorous.
– you can find most things C. wrote online at;
http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~mward/gkc/books/index.html