I’ve read that the historical accuracy of this year’s powerful horror film The Witch is very strong, not just in the setting and costuming, but also in the roots of the story. A New England family isolates themselves in an effort to maintain their purity and in doing so imperil themselves. They aren’t entirely innocent victims of Satan’s disciples, but they cannot foresee the repercussions of what we might consider accusable sins.
The realism of the film is also powerful because of how spiritual evil only seems to grow more and more persuasively present the more closely we attend to the real-world details, and the farther we travel through this time warp into the 17th Century. That has bothered some critics — that Eggers “literalizes” the evil forces that people believed in back then.
That’s a complaint from people who would snicker at the suggestion that the devil is an actual person, not a symbol of human ugliness or a boogeyman for our enemies. But you can’t literalize what is real.
I’ve also read people complaining that by making the witches real, it denigrates the memory of the people killed during the Salem Trials. Whatever. I was more disappointed with the film’s suggestion (and some of the cast’s press interviews) that the conclusion is an act of female empowerment and liberation.
I don’t know how it concludes, but isn’t female empowerment the present day Wicca reasoning? They say it’s the ultimate feminism, don’t they?
Absolutely. One of Wicca’s selling points is that once upon a time there was a Mother Goddess worshipping matriarchy that the patriarchy crushed and supplanted. Thank you, Margaret Murray for spurious history.
Overstreet’s review also highlights what I internally think of as the Buffy The Vampire Slayer Fallacy: Supernatural Evil exists, is active and is pervasive, but there is no supernatural, transcendent Good.
If there are demons everywhere, why are angels not also everywhere?