Cartoonist Doug TenNapel, whose work I’ve always enjoyed, has a new web comic called “Ratfist” going here. It just started in January, so if you start now, you won’t have a huge backlog to catch up on.
James M. Kushiner, at the Mere Comments blog where I can also be seen to post occasionally, discusses a furor over the new C. S. Lewis Bible, to be published by HarperCollins. They chose to use the New Revised Standard Version Bible, the famous “emasculated Bible” where all the icky male imagery has been fig-leafed over.
Do you see a problem with this?
Not to mention the questionable taste of having a C. S. Lewis Bible in the first place. From the petition sent to the publisher:
We the undersigned wish to express our disapproval of HarperOne’s choice of the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) for their edition of The C. S. Lewis Bible. Though we commend Harper for publishing a Bible that includes thoughts and meditations from C. S. Lewis, we disagree with their choice to key Lewis’s writings to the text of an intentionally gender-neutral translation of the scriptures that Lewis himself would have opposed. By doing so, Harper tacitly suggests that Lewis would have approved of the NRSV and the agenda that underlies its gender-neutral translation. Yet, the majority consensus among C.S. Lewis scholars is that Lewis was firmly against gender-neutral usage and the egalitarianism on which it is based.