Not undead, just brain dead

Personal note: Blogging from me will probably be light for the rest of the month. My publisher’s publicist has booked me for a “virtual book tour,” in which I’ll do guest blog posts and interviews for what looks like a daunting number of web sites.

My plan is to throw myself into this thing and work the (Charles) Dickens out of it. A virtual book tour would appear to be tailor made for my personality, so if I can’t shine at this I’ll be a man pretty much with nothing to say for himself.

While I’m thinking of it, buy my book.

It’s been in the news lately—The University of Baltimore is offering a credit course on zombies in literature.

Blumberg’s course is not without precedent. Brendan Riley, an English professor at Columbia College in Chicago, introduced a course called “Zombies in Popular Media” in 2006, a few years into the nation’s zombie revival. He believes he was the first to offer an entire course on zombies, a perennial entry on lists of oddest college courses.

“It was kind of a fight to get it as a recognized course at the school,” Riley said. “Because, at first, it appears to be kind of a frivolous topic.”

I suppose if I object to this, I’ll be identifying myself as not only a dinosaur, but a fossilized dinosaur.

But I do object, and I’m pretty sure I’d have objected back when I was in college. Continue reading Not undead, just brain dead

Things Chefs Won't Tell You

Yahoo News passes on 25 things chefs never tell you, like the fact most of them want to have their own cooking show or “Vegetarian is open to interpretation.”

About 15% of chefs said their vegetarian dishes might not be completely vegetarian. Beware if you’re one of those super-picky vegan types: One chef reported seeing a cook pour lamb’s blood into a vegan’s primavera.

What the?

Wall Street Journal to Begin Book Section

The Washington Post canned its book reviews from the printed paper last year. Other papers have been cutting book coverage for a long time. But behold, the Wall Street Journal say it will expand its Saturday edition and add to that expansion a portion of book reviews. The people rejoiced, and there was peace in those days.

Conan of Honolulu

Our friend Kit passed along some news I should have been aware of, and wasn’t. They’re filming a new Conan movie, even as I write. Release is planned for 2011.

The most intriguing fact about the production, it appears to me, is the casting of Jason Momoa (of Stargate Atlantis) as Conan. The implications are notable, since Momoa is a man of mixed race, and Howard’s original conception of his hero was… shall we say, not oriented in that direction.

I’m sure there are some who deny this, but the plain fact, as far as I can see, is that Howard was an unashamed racist. His idea of the Cimmerians, Conan’s tribe, was that they were the pure racial ancestors of the Celts (that’s one reason I never cared much for Arnold in the role. He could have at least worn the black wig they finally stuck on James Earl Jones’ head). Some of his stories involving black tribes include pretty condescending language.

I hasten to add that (in my opinion) pre-World War II racism needs to be judged somewhat differently from the modern kind. Many people in that time considered racism the rational extension of Darwinist science, and a lot of the most respectable people subscribed to race theory. Howard’s belief in the superiority of whites was not remarkable in his day, and very likely had no tinge of personal animosity in it. The Nazis had not yet shown up to show us all, in horribly graphic fashion, where such thinking actually leads.

So this casting involves a basic reinvention of the character from the outset. For all I know, it could work.

Still, I’d like to see somebody do Howard’s Conan someday. Hasn’t happened yet.

9 strong, 1 weak

The September Writers Digest Magazine is designated the “Big 10” issue, featuring a plethora, an abundance, myriad Top Ten lists by various writers. It features a lot of good stuff.

But one thing irritated me. So naturally I’ll concentrate on that.

One list, on pages 64-65, is called “Brush Up On Your Style in 10 Minutes Or Less.”

In the opening paragraph, the author, Brandon Royal, says, “Everyone can benefit from the occasional reminder of the principles of strong writing….”

Then he lists his list. Good stuff here, like “Use Straightforward Language,” “Trim Long Sentences,” and “Avoid Redundancies.” Meat-and-potatoes advice for punching up your prose. It’s well thought out and useful. Just the sort of thing young writers (especially but not exclusively) need to learn, to produce publishable manuscripts.

Until you get to Tip # 10. Here’s how it starts:

10 Avoid the Masculine Generic. The masculine generic refers to the sole use of the pronoun he or him when referring to situations involving both genders. As much as you can, make an effort to avoid using he when referring to either a he or a she, and using him when referring to either a him or a her….

He goes on to appeal to fairness, and the need to avoid putting off female readers.

Now I can understand promoting gender neutrality in your writing on the basis of making your work more saleable. I can understand it as a justice issue (though I bridle at that characterization). I can understand it as an appeal to self-interest, and the obvious dangers of making half the population mad at you.

But this bit of advice has no place on a list giving tips on strong writing. “He/she” or “him or her” is not stronger writing that “He” or “him.” “Humankind” is not a stronger word than “mankind.” “Chairperson” is not a stronger title than “chairman.”

Everybody knows this. But I’m saying it here.

And that, friends, is the strongest writing of all. When you say what you really think, rather than what you’re expected to say.

Thinking in Public Begins Today

Dr. Albert Mohler has a new podcast beginning today: “Thinking in Public.” Today’s show has guest Christian Smith, whose research leads him to believe many American young people who have grown up in our churches are less Christian than moralists. God to them is the distant author of a great self-help guide.

Outtakes from TV News (or Are We Live?)

Here’s a curious collection of TV news people making gaffes or showing their true colors. It begins with Katie Couric insulting the Palin family, and get much worse. Some of these clips are offensive (the second and third particularly), and there’s a good one in the middle of Rush Limbaugh’s comments about NFL Quarterback Donovan McNabb, which is not a gaffe at all, but the context around his comment which got him removed from that sport’s show. Watch the whole thing and you’ll hear what he’s saying and that at least of his co-hosts believes he is making a good point.

Labor Day counterrevolutionary post

It is Labor Day, and (as every year) I had to go to work. So I shall pour forth my frustration on the Communists, whom I hold ultimately responsible for the holiday, and who have done me no good at all.

Grim at Grim’s Hall embedded this, the original recording of the South African song (“Mbube”) that became “The Lion Sleeps Tonight.”

Continue reading Labor Day counterrevolutionary post