All posts by Lars Walker

East is east and west is west, unless I’m following a map

Made my annual trip to the tax preparer after work tonight. I ended up a victim of Urban Sprawl, as the business had moved way the heck out to the northwest (where the buffalo still roam and men are men, I trust). I had their directions with me, but as I followed the road eastward, (apparently) past all development, and found myself surrounded by gravel pits, I figured I must have gone the wrong way (I often get turned around, reading maps. I think I have an internal compass, but I also have an internal distorting magnet). So I turned back west, and that was no better. Finally I broke down and used my cell phone to call them (costs me money, since mine is designed for emergencies only. Which this was), and the lady explained that I’d been right the first time. I’d just lost confidence.

There’s a lesson here, I suppose. Something about putting your hand to the plow and not looking back, or Lot’s wife, or something. You can be wrong because you went the wrong way, or you can be wrong because you went the right way, but insufficiently.

In my heart, though, I believe that if I’d stubbornly kept on east on my first try, the space-time continuum would have spiraled, the earth’s crust would have shifted, and my goal would have turned out to be west after all.

Have a good weekend.

A day for a martyr

So this is Valentine’s Day, huh? Well, I’m not about to let anybody say I lack the proper spirit, even if I’m standing wretchedly on the outside, looking in at the revelers at the party, cold and hungry. In the snow. With the sniffles. And wet feet.

Here’s a link to Gene Edward Veith’s Cranach site—featuring a picture of the original St. Valentine’s relics. You can’t get more romantic than that.

My friend and fellow author Michael Z. Williamson sent me the following joke (can’t imagine why he thought of me):

Every Friday after work, a physicist goes down to the ice cream parlor, sits in the second-to-last seat, turns to the last seat, which is empty, and asks a girl, who isn’t there, if he can buy her an ice cream cone.

The owner, who is used to the weird local university types, always shrugs but keeps quiet. But when Valentine’s Day arrives, and the physicist makes a particularly heart-wrenching plea into empty space, curiosity gets the better of him, and he says, “I apologize for my stupid question, but surely you know there is NEVER a woman sitting in that last stool, man. Why do you persist in offering ice cream to an empty space?”

The physicist replies, “Well, according to quantum physics, empty space is never truly empty. Virtual particles come into existence and vanish all the time. You never know when the proper wave function will collapse and a girl might suddenly appear there.”

The owner raises his eyebrows. “Really? Interesting. But couldn’t you just ask one of the girls who comes here every Friday if you could buy HER a cone? Never know — she might say yes.”

The physicist laughs. “Yeah, right. How likely is THAT to happen?”

So there you go. I’ve done my part. Now go out and show your sweetie how much you care about him/her. Don’t even give a thought to me, alone in a quiet house, paying my bills like I do every other Thursday night. You have a good time. Enjoy yourselves. That’s all that’s important.

Sadism 101, for authors

Bad news for you “24” fans. I read over at Libertas that Joel Surnow, the producer up till now, has decided to leave the show. I find it hard not to believe that his decision has some connection with the recent news that the series is being “reinvented” in a more sensitive, progressive form. Hollywood breathes a sigh of relief. America is the bad guy again. Terrorists are good. The world is back in balance.

I tried watching “24” one season. I forget which season it was. It was the one where there was the big uproar because they actually had some Muslim terrorists.

I enjoyed it for a while. It was nice to see a show where (as Dirty Harry at Libertas notes) you couldn’t see the twists coming a mile away, telegraphed by liberal orthodoxy. I liked the violence, and the moral dilemmas.

But it got to the point where I couldn’t stand it anymore. Maybe being a writer spoiled it for me. I’m aware of plot and character all the time, and I’m just not capable of suspending my disbelief that much about how fast and how often human beings can recover from trauma in a single day. If Jack Bauer had had some kind of super powers, it might have worked for me, but no human being can absorb that much abuse and continue functioning. And once I’ve stopped believing in a story, I stop caring.

I’ve written about heroes and motivation before. If you want to put your hero through a lot of action, you have basically two choices. You can make him a man of violence who’s on the side of right (like Jack Bauer). This is actually harder than it seems. Nice guys—guys you really want to root for—aren’t often stone killers. But it can be done. You can make him a cop or a soldier, a guy who has made a career choice to protect and serve. Or—and this is a challenge but intriguing—you can make him a former bad man who has decided to go straight, perhaps for the love of a good woman. (This was a recurring theme of silent Westerns.) One advantage of this kind of hero is that you can kill him off tragically and satisfyingly in the end, and the reader understands it as redemptive (the original Rambo dies at the end of the novel First Blood).

(Parenthetically, I’d like to mention one of my personal heroes, or at least fascinations, Wild Bill Hickok. I haven’t followed him as closely as Lincoln [see my post yesterday], but I have been to his grave in Deadwood. Hickok discovered during the Civil War that he had a proficiency with the Colt revolver. After the war he became a policeman, though he supplemented his income through playing poker. During that phase of his career, I believe, he had a romantic view of himself as the kind of white knight Harper’s Weekly magazine had portrayed him as. All that ended one night in Abilene, Kansas when, while putting down a riot, he accidentally shot a friend who was coming to help him. Hickok served out his term as town marshal, but his contract was not renewed, and he didn’t particularly object. As far as we know, he never fired a weapon in anger again. He devoted himself to gambling, got married, and generally deteriorated. He was probably going blind when Jack McCall murdered him. No one has yet told his story properly in a novel or movie.)

The second kind of action hero is the Ordinary Guy Pushed to the Limit. Andrew Klavan’s Don’t Say a Word is an exceptional example of this approach. A man who is physically weak and utterly without fighting skills has to go far beyond his personal limits to save the life of his daughter. Dean Koontz’ Intensity, which I reviewed a few days back, is another example.

The advantage of this approach is that your reader will probably identify strongly with this kind of hero. Even as he wonders whether he’d be able to do what your protagonist is doing, he feels a little encouraged by the idea that a man (or woman) can actually do what a man’s gotta do.

The challenge in such a story is to really put the screws to your hero. Most ordinary people have to be pushed cruelly before they resort to violence. So you as the writer have to push him. You have to be ruthless and cruel, or your nice-guy hero will just roll over and give up. It’s amazing how hard this can be to do. In a real sense, you have to become the villain of your story.

Personally, I can’t understand how any fiction writer can ever ask the classic agnostic question, “If God is so good, why does He allow suffering in the world?” Fiction writers know the answer to that. Suffering’s the only thing that gets your characters off their duffs.

Lincoln’s Day

I’ll be short tonight, I’m afraid. I have a dentist appointment coming up (God bless a dentist who schedules evening hours!), with all the gladness and merriment inherent therein.

By way of The View From the Foothills, here’s a neat little utility to clean up your computer desktop.

Today is Abraham Lincoln’s birthday. Although he’s one of the great heroes of my life, I’ve gotten into the habit of arguing against him in recent years. For instance, I consider his constitutional argument extremely weak.

And yet…

And yet, he operated from a transcendent vision of America. He truly believed that this country was the laboratory of the future, that a better world was being created in these states. Nothing, he believed, should be permitted to destroy what was being done here. Slavery was a double threat, first because it made a mockery of the American vision, and second, because it was a political threat to national unity and purpose. Abolitionists derided him as a weakling because he wasn’t prepared to go straight in and get it abolished. He preferred a gradual, peaceful approach. That approach became impossible, and so he made the fateful decision to go to war to preserve the Union.

He himself was the living embodiment of the American dream. He’d been born in a dirt-floored cabin, to people who many considered only marginally human. He’d taken the opportunities this country gave him and used them to rise to the highest office in the land. He believed that everyone should have the same opportunities, and he never wavered from that commitment. In the end he died for it.

I’ve been to his birthplace, one childhood home, New Salem, his Springfield home, the White House, Ford’s Theatre and his tomb. I can’t get free of the man, and I don’t want to.

On autobiographical fiction

I’m consuming Dean Koontz books like salted peanuts right now. Although I still have reservations about his style, especially in the early books, I’d have to be even more in denial than I am to claim I don’t find his books satisfying on a very elemental level.

I don’t know what other people find in Koontz. I can’t imagine that all his millions of fans have the same reasons I do. Because what I respond to most in Koontz is the recurring themes of protecting abused children, and of adult children of abuse overcoming their personal demons.

It would be interesting to know what elements in the author’s own life led him to tell these kinds of stories. If he himself suffered abuse as a child, then I can only assume he’s made a remarkable recovery. Because it’s hard to write that way unless you’ve unpacked your old baggage.

I’ve got an unfinished manuscript on my laptop, and I’ve been stuck on it for at least a year. I made the mistake of having one of the main characters suffer from Avoidant Personality Disorder, as I do. I think that’s one (but not the only one) of the reasons the story’s stuck. Because stories are about overcoming obstacles and, in my heart, I don’t really believe this guy is going to overcome his.

Last time I talked about my reading here, I was working on Koontz’ Intensity. I said that I was finding it hard because the story involved spending a lot of time with a really vile sociopath. And that was true, as far as it went. But I think another part of the problem was that I really—really—identified with the heroine, a woman named Chyna Shepherd who, because of childhood abuse, has walled herself off from the world. But she is forced by circumstances to go far beyond her personal limits, and to suffer much, to save a child’s life.

Loved it. But it was harrowing.

Then I went on to read Cold Fire, which looked like it would be a lot more fun. It’s about a guy who’s a living superhero. From time to time he gets psychic promptings that tell him to be at such and such a place at such and such a time, and to be prepared with this or that equipment. When he shows up, he finds somebody’s life in danger, and he saves them.

But the story gets darker. A woman reporter who falls in love with him discovers that his “gift” has its roots in terrible events in his childhood, events he has blotted out of his memory. With her help he confronts them and faces the truth.

At which point, of course, I stopped identifying.

Anyway, the moral (I guess) is, if you want to write autobiographical fiction about your own neuroses, it’s best to wait until you’re all better.

Thursday post-mortem

Things are looking better and brighter now. I’m not referring to the weather forecast, which calls for a cold snap over the weekend, but to my personal psychological climate. Yesterday’s storms have largely passed. You want to know more? Well, if you insist…



The first thing
that got me down yesterday was Romney’s withdrawal speech at CPAC. I wasn’t enamored of him as a candidate, but he seemed to me the best of the field. I think my dislike for McCain, like that of many conservatives, is mostly feelings-based. He bugs me, and I’m pretty sure I’d bug him if he knew me. I suspect that whenever he finds an excuse to give the Christian Right a wedgie, he goes away from the finished task with a warm feeling of having made the country a better place.

That said, I’m really tired of the people who call into radio shows and bark that McCain’s a liberal and they’d rather see Clinton or Obama in the White House. You have to live in a very bizarre alternate reality, it seems to me, to say that. I’d rather hire a guy who does his job well and cares about the welfare of my business, but gives me a hard time now and then, than hire a guy who’s polite and empathetic and keeps giving the stock away.

I like hyperbole as a satiric technique. I’ve been a big fan of Ann Coulter’s until recently. But some people seem to be taking their own hyperbole seriously.

If I wanted to be a member of the Silly Party, I’d register as a Democrat. Continue reading Thursday post-mortem

Checking in, checking out

Sorry I can’t do a proper post tonight. I’m having a rather bad day (nothing terrible or life-threatening, just a pile of aggravations that ganged up on me all at once), and I’ll spend the evening putting out little fires. Metaphorically, of course.

Ash Wednesday Intensity

Sorry I’m late tonight, and I’m afraid I’ll be short as well. Tonight I read scripture for our Ash Wednesday service (turned out the verses they’d given me to prepare were the wrong ones. No matter, I’m a quick study), and my bathroom sink has suddenly developed a massive clog. I hadn’t even noticed it was running slow before this morning.

Must be my renter’s fault.

I’m currently reading Dean Koontz’ Intensity. I remember, back when I had cable, that one of the networks ran it as an original film. I remember looking at the ads and thinking, “That’s precisely the kind of story I don’t want to see or read. I have no interest in spending quality time with a psychopath.” I’m pretty sure that was one of the reasons I avoided checking Koontz out for so long.

My opinion, as far as this book goes, haven’t changed with the reading thus far. Usually Koontz treats us to a group of interesting good characters whom I enjoy getting to know. There was such a group in this book, but they got removed from the stage early on. Now there’s just the heroine and the psychopath. The heroine’s fine. I like her. But I’m spending much more time with the serial killer than I’d choose if given my druthers.

That’s my personal taste. Apparently a lot of people feel differently.

Start the democratic process without me

I’m feeling low tonight. I think I may be suffering from chicken soup fatigue. And the whole thing’s frustrating. All winter I’ve been trying to get on a workout regimen, using my Nordic Track, and every time I get to where I’m starting to feel the benefits, I come down with another cold. And by the time I’ve recovered I’m back to square one.

Also I suppose I’m feeling guilty because I won’t be attending the Minnesota caucuses tonight. I’m staying away out of principle, you understand. The caucus system is a transparent attempt by The Man to disenfranchise the Avoidant-American community, and I refuse to prop up such an unjust system.

I’ve been listening to talk radio, too, and the calls have convinced me that both of the Republican frontrunners are probably Communist moles. Possibly alien pod people.

Anyway, if you haven’t checked Joe Carter’s Evangelical Outpost today, he has a great post on the true story of Galileo and the Inquisition. It’s not what they told you on the Discovery Channel. The reality was a lot more complicated, and Galileo wasn’t any martyr to science.

He’d have probably caucused, too. The sellout.

The Timing of the Shrove

The weekend went as per my previous announcement. I spent it in bed or on the couch, trying to get past this latest rampaging rhinovirus. I canceled two things I’d planned to do. One of them turned out to be fairly important in regard to the situation of one of my old friends, though no one had bothered to tell me that until after I’d decided I couldn’t go. Nevertheless, the theme of the weekend was Bad Cold, plus Bad Conscience.

Today is Shrove Monday, and tomorrow is Shrove Tuesday. The “shrove” refers to the sacrament of confession and absolution—getting shriven. One was (I suppose still is, in several communions) expected to go to confession and be shriven in preparation for the forty day fast of Lent.

In Norwegian they call it Fetetirsdag, which corresponds to the French Mardi Gras, or “Fat Tuesday.” That less spiritual-sounding name rises from the fact that all red meat was forbidden during the Lenten fast. It was considered a sin even to have animal fat in your house during that period. So people would feast on all the fat that was laying around. Fat-free diets were not fashionable (or safe) in those days, when food was harder to get than it is now. You didn’t just pitch something that could provide nutrition, especially late in the winter. If you couldn’t have it in the kitchen, you wanted to carry it around on your waist with you. It would help you get through Lent.

Pancakes were a popular food for using up the fat, which is why pancakes are traditionally associated with Shrove Tuesday. Sexual relations were also forbidden in Lent, which, I suppose, accounts for Mardi Gras and Carnivale.

In many churches people still fast for Lent. It’s rare, I think, for anyone to do a real, old-fashioned, no-meat-or-meat-products-at-all plus no sex Lent anymore, one where you actually drop a lot of weight, but many people give up some indulgence—chocolate or ice cream or booze.

Many Lutherans do it too, but that isn’t part of my pietist tradition. Also I’m afraid I wouldn’t hold out, and I’d have something new to feel guilty about.

Anyway, I already don’t drink, and I have no sex life. I’m way ahead of most Lenten fasters any day of the year. Maybe I should fast from fasting during Lent. It would be hard, but good for…

No.