Category Archives: Uncategorized

My mind wanders: Richard Mentor Johnson

Today, free association. Because I used to work for the Association of Free Lutheran Congregations. (Actually, no – I just free-associated that thought.)

What actually happened was that I was reading the latest issue of the Acton Institute’s Religion & Liberty magazine today, and saw an article about the founding father John Dickinson. My brain burped, and somehow the name came out “Dick Johnson” in my mind.

That sent me sliding down the memory hole, to my antique boyhood. One of the only books we had in our home was the anthology of light verse, What Cheer, published by Modern Library, edited by David McCord. I spent a lot of time with that book, understanding about half of what I read but fascinated by the rhyme, rhythm, and word play. One of the poems that caught my fancy was an American political ditty about the politician and soldier Richard Mentor Johnson (1780-1850). I can’t find the poem in my own copy at the moment, but I remember the chorus going, “Rumpsey-dumpsy, rumpsey-dumpsy; I, Dick Johnson, killed Tecumseh.”

The poem struck me at the time because I had a schoolteacher named Dick Johnson. I wondered, vaguely, who this Dick Johnson might be (I did not wonder about Tecumseh. Contrary to what the educational demagogues are telling us today, we did learn about Native Americans in school back then). Once the internet became available, I eventually looked the man up. He had a fascinating story, one that demonstrates some of the overlooked nuances in American history.

Going straight to the headline, Richard Johnson was Vice President of the United States under Martin Van Buren. He holds the distinction of being the only V.P. ever elected by the Senate under the provisions of the Twelfth Amendment of the Constitution.

Johnson was a Kentuckian. He attended Transylvania University and became a lawyer, being noted for doing pro bono work for the poor. Among the properties he inherited from his father was a female slave of mixed race, what they called an “octoroon,” named Julia Chinn. He fell in love with her. It was illegal for them to marry, but Johnson treated her as a common law wife and acknowledged their children. This arrangement would impair his political career, but he remained faithful to her until her death in 1833. Both their daughters married white men, though they were not permitted to inherit his property.

He served in the Kentucky House of Representatives, and then became the first native Kentuckian elected to Congress. He was one of the “war hawks” in the run-up to the War of 1812. Notably, he supported the claims of Alexander Hamilton’s widow to army wages which her late husband had refused during the Revolution, despite the fact that Hamilton had been a member of the opposition party.

Back in Kentucky, Johnson raised a troop of 300 volunteers for the war and they elected him their major; later he became a colonel. Most of these volunteers’ actions were against the Native Americans allied with the British. At the Battle of the Thames in October 1813, he led a charge against the Shawnee leader Tecumseh in which Tecumseh was killed. Johnson himself never claimed to have fired the shot that struck that charismatic man down, but several others said he did. Historians are undecided.

The capitol was in ruins, burned by the English, when Johnson returned to congress in 1814, and they met in temporary quarters. As a legislator, Johnson pushed for pensions for military widows and orphans, and for public improvements in the west.

In 1819 he was elected to the Senate (state legislatures did it back in those days, you may recall). In 1820 he voted in favor of a law to bar slavery north of the 36˚30’ north latitude line (with the exception of Missouri). In 1822 he proposed a bill outlawing imprisonment for debtors in the US. It did not pass, but he reintroduced it every year. (Full disclosure – he had debt troubles of his own.)

He became a supporter of Andrew Jackson, and was one of the original founders of the Democratic Party in 1828. In 1825 he succeeded in getting funding for a school for children of the Choctaw nation which was established on his own property and which he oversaw (there were accusations of conflict of interest).

On an amusing note, Johnson sponsored a bill in 1823 for funding an expedition to discover whether the earth was hollow. This proposal failed. In 1828 he lost a race for reelection to the senate. He returned to the House in 1829. In 1832, his law to abolish debtor’s prisons finally went through. He was considered as Andrew Jackson’s running mate in 1832, but Martin Van Buren got the nod. Friends, including Davy Crockett, urged Johnson to run for president in 1836, but he ended up as Van Buren’s running mate. Much of Johnson’s political opposition rose from distaste, especially in the south, for his racially mixed domestic situation. Thus, though Van Buren did win the presidency, Johnson got considerably fewer electoral votes, and the race was thrown into the Senate, as mentioned above.

His tenure as vice president was not notable, except for continuing accusations of conflict of interest, and his adoption of a personal fashion brand – he made it a practice to wear a red tie and vest at all times. In 1840, although Van Buren was reelected, Johnson was not. By that time, it is reported, his mind was beginning to fail.

Back home in Kentucky, he served in the state legislature and was one of Daniel Boone’s pallbearers. He died of a stroke, aged 70.

The early 19th Century is a somewhat neglected period in our common memory, it seems to me, except for a few incidents like the Alamo and the California Gold Rush. But I always found it a fascinating time, full of idiosyncrasies, as the new country tried out its muscles, tested its limits, and tried to figure out exactly what kind of a country it wanted to be.

The Collegium Scholare Antiquitatis (COSCAN)

Here’s the latest news from the Saga Heritage Foundation, the organization that produced the wonderfully translated book, Viking Legacy.

Their next projects, as I understand it, are English versions of the Flatey Book and Tormod Torfaeus’ Latin history of Norway. I doubt there’ll be much work for me in all this, but it’s worth spreading the news.

Prof. Titlestad, who wrote Viking Legacy, is the fellow in the wide-brimmed hat.

Current viewing: ‘Maelstrom’

What is on Walker’s TV as he writes this blog post, America asks.

The TV series above. It’s been my habit for some time to turn to some old TV show or movie at this time of day, as a sort of white noise. Quite often it’s been some old British crime TV series. I watched, for instance, several episodes of an ancient series called “Z-Cars” (pronounced, of course, “Zed cars”), which in its earliest seasons featured a beardless Brian Blessed as a uniformed cop – one of his early acting jobs.

Now I’ve found this 1985 British miniseries set in Norway, entitled “Maelstrom.” It was broadcast in the US, on one of the cable networks, back in the late ’80s, and I recorded it on VHS at the time because, after all, it was set in Norway, and it wasn’t awful.

It stars an English/Swedish actress named Tussi Silberg as a British woman who discovers that a Norwegian millionaire she’s never heard of has left her some property and a dried fish factory. Mystified, she flies over there, where she finds everyone welcoming, and nobody seems to begrudge her a share of the family’s rather large fortune. But strange occurrences… occur, and behind it all there’s the continued puzzle of what possible connection the old man might have had to her.

It’s not bad. The acting’s fair, except for some histrionics at the end. The psychology is pretty naïve. And, of course, there’s the beautiful Norwegian scenery.

Saga reading report: ‘The Tale of Ogmund Bash,’ and ‘The Tale of Thorvald Tasaldi’

The Viking knarr “Snorri,” at L’Anse Aux Meadows, Newfoundland. My photo.

I have read a couple more stories from The Complete Sagas of Icelanders, and I shall describe them for you. These two are not sagas in the proper sense of the word, but Þátturs, a word that more or less means stories or anecdotes. They are generally found as appendages to longer sagas – this particular pair were attached to the last major saga we considered, “Killer-Glum’s Saga.”

The first is “The Tale of Ogmund Bash.” Ogmund is a freedman of Killer-Glum’s. He has prospered better than one would expect, having the resources to buy himself a merchant ship (knarr) for a business voyage to Norway. Freedmen, former slaves, remained in a dependent relationship with their former masters, so he appeals to Killer-Glum for his endorsement, which he receives, and Glum’s son comes along.

Arriving in Norway, Ogmund makes a rookie sailing mistake, entering a harborage at night and colliding with another merchant ship, which sinks. The ship’s owner responds angrily, and their conflict ends with the man boarding Ogmund’s ship and knocking Ogmund senseless with the hammer of his axe. Ogmund takes no action to avenge his honor, so that though he comes home with profit, his reputation is ruined. Killer-Glum cuts off their relationship, saying, in spite of Ogmund’s protestations that he was only trying to protect Killer-Glum’s son “You shouldn’t have considered that… when he didn’t want to himself. It would have seemed worth it to me to have you both dead, provided you’d shown your courage by taking vengeance.”

Ogmund, however, is just biding his time. In a few years he goes back to Norway, encounters King Olaf Trygvesson, and kills the man who humiliated him.

In an odd sequel, a new character introduced into the story, wrongly accused of the killing, flees to Sweden, which is still heathen, and falls in with a priestess of Frey. He accompanies her on her annual rounds, transporting an idol on a wagon. In time the idol gets broken, and Ogmund himself pretends to be the god. He and the woman collect a lot of treasure, and in time she accompanies him back to Norway, where he renews his faith, she converts, and they live happily ever after.

The next Þáttur is “The Tale of Thorvald Tasaldi” (the editors might have done us a favor by informing us what “tasaldi” means. I can’t find it online either). Anyway, Thorvald is the nephew of Killer-Glum, and he also travels to Norway in the time of Olaf Trygvesson. There, as every young Icelander must in every saga, he is met with honor and favor by the king. King Olaf gives him a place at his table between two of his men, one of whom is friendly, the other hostile. The hostile one maneuvers a situation where Thorvald feels obligated to go on the king’s behalf on a mission to try to convert an obstinate, rich heathen. Thorvald goes, accompanied by the friendly table-mate.

On arriving at the rich man’s estate, they find that he has no visible help running his farm – it’s just the farmer and his daughter there. When Thorvald and his friend explain their errand, they end up wrestling with both the father and daughter, but Thorvald prevails because he has heeded a dream he had, telling him to bind a letter containing the names of God onto his chest. So the farmer summons up “those who live in the undercroft” (the elves, the Underground Folk as I call them in my novels) who have been the ones doing the farm work here. Those powerful beings capture them, but the farmer lets them go. They leave, then return, determined to fulfill their mission. They finally succeed, and return to great honor from the king.

My general impression of these stories is that when a man had voyaged to Norway, he was expected to have a fine tale to tell. And when his descendants re-told that story, they were expected to embroider it. The saga accounts of life in a king’s court tend to follow familiar patterns that recur from story to story. The tale of the man masquerading as the god Frey, too, mimics other similar accounts (which likely have some factual basis, as we know such ceremonial circuits were part of the old religion).

A kind of a defense of Rachel Zegler

Tolkien and Lewis didn’t like this Snow White, but they’d have liked it better than the new one.

Just to show my vigorous independence of mind, I’m going to confess before the world that I think Rachel Zegler is very pretty. There have been a lot of jokes about how no character played by Gal Gadot (admittedly a knockout) needs to fear that poor Rachel would be a threat to her status as “fairest of them all.” Several commenters have disparaged Ms. Zegler’s looks. But she appeals to me. The delicate-figure and-big-eyes look works, as far as I’m concerned. Kind of like a… what comes to mind? A Disney princess.

But it’s not just Rachel’s appearance that I feel I need to defend. Granted, she has certainly earned (at least) a lot of the ridicule that’s been heaped on her, for her public condescension and tone-deafness. She has become the poster girl for Woke arrogance – and she’s earned it.

And yet, I don’t think she’s entirely to blame.

In a real sense, I think, she’s been trying to play it by the book. Only she’s been using the wrong book.

She has relentlessly said the wrong thing in almost every situation. First she insulted her audience, and then she doubled down on the insults. Apparently the studio people tried to rein her in, to explain that you can’t alienate half your potential audience and then expect them to want to see you sing and dance. But she didn’t seem to get the message.

This, I think, was not because she didn’t care about the Disney enterprise. I think she did it because she believes deeply in the Disney enterprise, in a different way.

She believes in what the Disney movies say.

And what do the Disney movies say?

The Disney movies, especially the recent ones, tell young women like Rachel, “You go, girl! You speak your truth! Don’t let anybody – especially any man – tell you what to do! You are a strong woman, and if you only stand your ground and never compromise, you must triumph in the end!”

And that’s how she’s played it. She hasn’t listened to anybody who told her she was off course – even if they paid her salary. Because she has to be true to the truth of her heart. In the end everyone will be forced to admit that they were wrong, and that she – the Princess, the Girl Boss – was right all along. And everyone will love her.

That didn’t exactly work out.

Instead, she now finds herself out of work and a public laughingstock.

The cognitive dissonance must be horrific. Her goddess has failed her. The promise of the Disney Princess came up snake eyes; she wished upon a star and her wish didn’t come true.

I feel sorry for her at this place in her life. It must be very lonely.

Now, if Rachel’s life were a film script, I know what I’d do in Act II.

I’d have her meet a Big Guy. A guy with broad shoulders, a farmer or a trucker or a plumber or something. Some plot contrivance would throw them together, and she would hate him at first sight. It would be like dog and cat. Everything he did would be seen as an insult, a male chauvinist provocation. She would harangue him about his privilege and scream about how he was oppressing her just by existing.

Finally, in a rage, she’d attack him with her fists. He’d grab her wrists until she stopped struggling. Then he’d kiss her hard. And her insides would turn to goo.

And then they’d get married, move to a small town, and have lots of babies.

Of course, such a heretical story could never get filmed today.

But I’ll bet it would sell tickets.

Unlike some other films I could mention.

Words spoken and misunderstood

Radio Announcer Markus Rautio in the studio, ca. 1930. Photo credit: Yle Archives. Unsplash license.

This continues to be a strange time in my disordered life. I’m still feeling the effects of finishing my great life project. There’s no reason I can’t start another great project, of course. Or several smaller ones. One must fill one’s time after all. Sedentary though I am by nature, my brain, I find, needs to be doing stuff. So I drag myself out of bed at 6:30 a.m. and (for the present) work on the art and science of book narration. I’m taking it in small steps, as Jordan Peterson recommends, laboring to overcome my technophobia through familiarization. And it’s working. I am getting more accustomed to it. For the present I’m just recording the instructional book I bought, to desensitize myself to the hardware and the software and the protocols. But I now begin to dimly envision myself actually recording one of my books. Or several. The Epsom books – I still think I’ll need to acquire an Irishman for the Erling series.

Here’s a thought of no importance whatever: It actually relates to narration – as narration is a branch of the broader field of voice acting and announcing. And I’m an old radio hand – best copy reader in my broadcast school class, worst recording engineer.

When I was but a wee tot, I used to hear announcers on the radio telling me that such and such a program was “brought to you by XXXXXX Company.”

And – this was before I knew how to read or spell – I heard the word “brought” as “brokt.” Once I did learn to spell, a few years later, I found that the word in fact did have a couple letters inside it that would work for the “k” sound, sort of – the “gh.” But I also learned that the “gh” wasn’t pronounced. The word was pronounced simply “brot.”

But recently, while watching a couple series on Amazon Prime (“Reacher” Season 3 and “The House of David,” since you ask) I heard the announcer saying that at least one of these programs was brought to me by… I forget what company. But I am certain she (it was a she) in fact pronounced the word “brokt.” So that the phrasing went “brok to you.”

The “gh” in “brought,” of course, is a residue of obsolete pronunciation. Whenever we find such strange, unused letters in an English word, they’re usually the shadow of a past genuine pronunciation. In olden times, the word was in fact pronounced something like “brokt.” Or “brocht.”

I wonder if that pronunciation by professional announcers (I am adamant that’s what they’re saying; I’m not just delusional) harkens unconsciously back to that antique English. Or maybe its just the way the human tongue naturally curls when set to the work of pronouncing those particular sounds.

I clearly remember ads on that same station (it was the Faribault, Minnesota station, specializing in Old Time [that means oompah] music, advertising Lockwood Auto Company. But I remember that I heard it as Lockwood “L-O” Company. That one, I’ll grant you, I got wrong. Made no sense at all, but when you’re a kid lots of things don’t make sense.

‘I Cheerfully Refuse,’ by Leif Enger

The horizon was dirty and the waves were back to horses. Sometimes a gust knocked one’s mane clean off and scattered it abroad. The wind remembered ice.

You may recall that I’m a big fan of Leif Enger, who not only writes like an angel but is a fellow Minnesotan. So I was happy to see (how did I miss it?) that he had a new novel out – I Cheerfully Refuse.

I’m sorry to say I was disappointed by this book. This wasn’t the sort of thing I looked for from the author of Peace Like a River. However, since it’s beyond dispute that Enger is both smarter than I and a better writer, I may have simply misunderstood him.

I Cheerfully Refuse is a postapocalyptic story – but not the usual kind with zombies or Mad Max societal ferality. The America of this book, about a generation in the future, I guess, is controlled by sinister powers known as the “astronauts,” who dominate business and politics from the east coast. But before that there was apparently a takeover by “hard-shell patriots” who burned books in “fundie bonfires.” Now life goes on in America, but the roads are bad, the electricity sporadic, the air and water polluted, and many communities exercise vigilante law.

Rainy (short for Rainier), our hero and narrator, is a house painter and part-time gig musician (electric bass) in the community of Icebridge (not far from Greenstone, the setting of Enger’s novel, Virgil Wander) on the shore of Lake Superior. His beloved wife (or partner, I wasn’t sure) is Lark, who runs a used book shop. Theirs is a happy life, and they get on well with their neighbors.

Then Kellan arrives. Kellan is a starving wanderer. It’s soon clear that he’s an escapee from one of the “medical ships” where human experimentation is done. Harboring such a fugitive is illegal, but Rainy and Lark take him in. He has something to trade for their hospitality – a rare copy of a book Lark has been searching for all her life.

But the authorities come for them, and before long Rainy’s world has been shattered. He flees in a sailboat, with no plan except a vague idea of returning to the Slate Islands, where he and Lark had a happy interlude years before. But he’s a hunted man now. In time he will acquire a companion, a nine-year-old girl he rescues from an abusive home. But it’s a cold world on the great lake with the law on your trail.

I Cheerfully Refuse is as well-written as you’d expect from an author of Enger’s genius. But his previous books have carried a gentle but pervasive odor of Christianity – sometimes even explicitly Christian. There’s a sort of Christianity here, too, but it’s the sentimental kind – a Rousseauean conception that people are basically good and only do wrong because society is out of skew. That all legal punishment is evil, and everyone should just be forgiven and set free.

I perceived (perhaps I’m paranoid) a political tone here that I’ve never seen in Enger before. As if he’s one of those panicked by the rise of our current president, who believes all the stereotypes about American conservatives, especially religious ones, as cultural troglodytes: “There was a sinuous distrust of text and its defenders.”

I might point out that it is not the conservative schools that are turning out illiterate graduates. It’s not the conservatives who try to purge the classics from curricula. It’s not the conservatives who design ugly, brutalist buildings and tape bananas to walls and call it art.

As I said, maybe I misunderstood. Maybe there’s a rich Christian subtext here that passed over my head. After all, big Pharma is a major villain, and there is a plot line in there arguing against assisted suicide.

All I can say is that I Cheerfully Refuse is a well-written book that disappointed this fan.

Fossils congregate

This actually looks a little like Cahill’s. But it’s a photo by Pablo Merchan Montes. Unsplash license.

Somebody at the table brought up the subject of libraries, and I, of course, had a thing to say about that.

“The day is coming,” I opined, “when parents will be telling their kids, ‘You know, once upon a time libraries were places where people went to borrow books, not homeless shelters and day care centers.’”

I don’t know how impressed my friends were by this insight-slash-prophecy. How many things are there around us that started out as one thing and ended up as something else entirely? The theater began with morality plays during church festivals. Nascar began (I am informed) with bootleggers racing revenuers during Prohibition. Nokia started out as a wood pulp processing company in Finland.

There’s a group of my high school classmates – those who still live in the area, and who still live at all – who get together for lunch someplace every few months. This last Wednesday we went to the “new” restaurant in Kenyon, our home town – new in terms of management, though two previous owners have occupied the same commercial space. I might as well plug them – the manager was nice enough to send one of his staff up on a ladder to hang a shade to block the too-bright sunshine coming in through the south-facing windows. The place is called “Cahill’s,” which strikes me as an odd name for a Mexican fusion restaurant. But they were able to provide the stodgy anglo hamburger I required (really quite good). Also they had cloth napkins on the tables – I wonder how long it’s been since any eatery in Kenyon has boasted cloth napkins.

The conversation ran along customary retirees’ lines – where people take their vacations, how their kids and grandkids are doing (I had nothing to offer on that score), and our aches, pains, and medical procedures; I thought I had the prize for the most recent surgery, with my detached retina, but one of the “girls” had shoulder surgery just about simultaneously.

Afterward I filled up my gas tank (I like to support the local economy) at the Co-op gas station where my dad was a member, and headed back, past buildings that used to be something else, or the ghosts of buildings no longer standing. I had realized shortly after setting out that morning that I probably shouldn’t have gone at all – my left eye is still fuzzy; reading signs was a challenge, though I pretty much know the way without sign-reading. And the ride back was better; the sun was brighter and I remembered that I can see more clearly if I just close that bad eye.

Arrived home utterly exhausted from the rigorous exertion of ordinary human interaction; I was played out for the rest of the day.

Theodor Kittelsen

Tonight, I had Norwegian folklore on my mind, and I found this amusing video on YouTube. It concerns the Norwegian artist Theodor Kittelsen (1857-1914), one of my favorites. He was an imaginative illustrator, and sometimes — in my opinion — he was ahead of his time, employing stylistic techniques that would become popular later on.

I came on an anecdote involving Kittlesen in my reading recently. The author Sigrid Undset, when she was a girl, went with her mother and sisters to spend a summer holiday at the seaside. They were very poor after the death of her father, but the cottage was available cheap. To her astonishment, little Sigrid found that their closest neighbor was the artist Theodor Kittlesen and his family. She made friends with Kittelsen’s daughter, and was introduced to the great artist, whom she greatly admired. At that point in her life she was contemplating becoming an artist herself. After a while she worked up the courage to show Kittlesen some of her own drawings.

“You have talent enough, poor thing,” Kittlesen sighed. He went on to warn her that art was no easy career.

Freezin’ season

Photo credit: Juha Lakaniemi, planetlb. Unsplash license.

I suppose we should all take a second to revel in this rare moment of national unity. By which I mean, of course, the cold weather. All across America, from capital A to shining small a, citizens are sharing the Minnesota Experience. We used to say the winter weather keeps the riffraff out, but it doesn’t seem to be working very well.

Anyway, it’s cold. On Sunday morning I got up for church, put on my suit and trench coat and hat (I’m the only guy at my church who dresses that way for services, but somebody’s got to show the flag), and went out to the garage and got in my car.

And I couldn’t get the door to latch. I slammed it a few times. It caught at last.

And then I checked to see if I could open it again, and I couldn’t.

I hit the buttons on the remote. I hit the buttons on the door. Nothing.

Now I could, in theory, have driven to church and crawled out the passenger side. But after trying it in the garage, I found it was a lot of effort for an old fat man in a long coat. So I gave up on church.

I am, indeed, a fair weather disciple.

My primary theory was that some water had gotten into the door when I washed the car last week, and had frozen, and that was the problem.

Yesterday, I squirted WD-40 into the keyhole. Tried to turn the key, and it still wouldn’t unlock. I gave it overnight to marinate.

Today it was still frozen. I used a hair dryer to warm the lock up. A sleeveless and bootless task, as the English used to say. (I think.)

Tomorrow will be a little warmer. If I still can’t get the thing open, I’ll assume the problem is not ice but mechanics, and try to get an appointment at my garage.

Why you should care about this I have no idea. I’m still at post-translation loose ends. I did nothing today, writing-wise, except to start getting my figures into a spreadsheet for my tax preparer.

As I’ve said too many times, my taxes are way too complicated for my low income. You could say, as far as that goes, that it’s a good thing my script translation gig has gone the way of the floppy disc. At least I don’t have to fill out forms for foreign income. H. & R. Block charges for every form.

But does that make up for losing the right to honestly tell chicks I’m “in the movie business”?

I might be able to tell you if I’d ever tried it.