‘No Room for the Innocent,’ by Dan Wheatcroft

The “Leveller” trilogy rounds itself off in a satisfying way in Dan Wheatcroft’s No Room for the Innocent.

This series, as you may recall, involves intertwining plots centered on two main characters – Inspector Thurstan Baddeley of the Liverpool police and a man known as Nicks, who is a top-level assassin dispatched by a high-level, secret government organization to kill the worst criminals the police can’t touch. The two men know each other, and share a grudging respect, though Nicks is always one step ahead of investigators.

But now there’s a problem. Nicks’ handler, Don, has been murdered. Because Don is his only contact in the organization, he’s suddenly out in the cold and vulnerable. When he learns that his controllers have been less than altruistic in their operational aims, he can think of only one person to go to for help – Inspector Baddeley.

The writing in these books is adequate, with occasional grammatical lapses. But the author’s knowledge of police work (he’s a former cop himself) makes the settings and procedures authentic, and I liked the characters a lot.

I enjoyed this series, and recommend it, with only minor cautions for grown-up themes and violence. Conservative opinions are occasionally hinted at.

2 thoughts on “‘No Room for the Innocent,’ by Dan Wheatcroft”

  1. Hi, Lars,
    Just discovered your site and wanted to say thank you very much for reading my books and even more so for writing your reviews. I first noted your name when you Amazon reviewed ‘The Box’. My first thought then was ‘Wow, this chap gets it!’ Not in a Mafia kind of way, obviously.
    I particularly liked your comment that Sutton Box was where Police careers go to die. I hope you don’t mind but I’ve taken to using it in any advertising where brevity is a necessity.
    I’ve really enjoyed reading your further reviews of the other books that evolved along the way into the wider series and they’ve made me smile, in a pleasant way. It’s nice to know when someone understands the intentions behind the stories. Your conclusion, at the end of your on-site ‘Box’ review, as to why I use a pseudonym was wonderful. Thanks again. Best wishes, Dan.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.