Privileged Information by Stephen White

A while back I read an article (in National Review Online, I think) that recommended mystery authors conservatives might like. Among them were Jonathan Kellerman and Stephen White, both writers of books featuring psychologist detectives. I took to Kellerman right off. White delighted me less, but I’ve run through the Kellerman in paperback now, and I’ve decided to move on to White. Privileged Information is the book that kicked off White’s Alan Gregory series. Having completed it, I think I may have underrated him on the first book.

Alan Gregory practices in Boulder, Colorado. He is separated from his wife and lives with his dog. He has a healthy practice and likes to take long bike rides for recreation.

One of his patients, a seductive and sexually troubled woman, commits suicide. Somehow her father, a rich, powerful man, gets his hands on information that leads him to believe that Gregory has violated professional ethics by sleeping with her. He calls for an investigation aimed at getting his license revoked.

Then another recent female patient of Gregory’s is killed in an auto accident.

And another female patient is murdered.

A police detective begins to look closely at the psychologist’s life.

Meanwhile Gregory starts dating a local prosecuting attorney who has intimacy issues. And one of his male patients begins to act in a bizarre, threatening manner.

None of this is coincidence. Someone is working out a plan, and Gregory’s life (along with his girlfriend’s) will depend on his ability to analyze the workings of a very dangerous mind. Because the rules of privileged information prevent him from telling the police about certain things he knows. And the killer knows that and uses it.

I can’t think about Stephen White’s books without comparing them to Jonathan Kellerman’s. And in terms of plain fun, for me there’s no contest.

Kellerman’s world is California bright. I picture his scenes in vivid colors and sharp definition. White’s stories leave me with a darker feeling, evening in an impressionist painting. I have a harder time imagining what his characters look like.

To me, White seems more realistic. Alan Gregory isn’t an optimist like Kellerman’s Alex Delaware. He practices psychology more in the manner I’d practice it if I had gone into the field (which would have been insanely wrongheaded). Gregory has trouble leaving his work at the office. He agonizes over minor failures, the sort that lead patients to leave therapy, to say nothing of the big ones where patients kill themselves.

I think that’s the main reason I enjoy Kellerman’s books more. White’s books are uncomfortably close to home.

I haven’t really discerned the conservative elements the National Review promised me. There was a gratuitious swipe at the Reagans in this book. However, one plot element did satisfy my prejudices. A female character turns out to be wrong about a serious matter, and apologizes at the end. When was the last time you read a book where something like that happened?

So I think I’ll carry on with White. I think Alan Gregory may grow on me.

0 thoughts on “Privileged Information by Stephen White”

  1. Lars, you need to make the acquaintance, virtually at least, of S.T. Karnick. He writes for lots of conservative mags, is a MS Lutheran, and has a great little web site at stkarnick.com. Go to his site and search for a mystery category. He’s got some great stuff there. Be sure to look out for Lord Darcy.

  2. Yeah, Darcy’s amusing fluff, and so is most of Garrett’s other work (though there’s a deeply disturbing tale of his in one of Pournelle’s “There will be War” anthologies).

  3. Back to White ;-), I really like his Alan Gregory books and have read them all. I also like Kellerman, but he has plunged in quality over the years, after a wonderful first half-dozen or so books. White hasn’t written so many, but so far has managed to keep up the standards or even improve. In particular, White is much better at the relationship aspects (Gregory’s wife, child, neighbours) than Kellerman (Robyn and that new girlfriend — not really “characters” at all).

  4. This is an opportunity for me to improve my own critical facilities when it comes to fiction. I assure you I am not being facetious. What makes Darcy lightweight?

  5. Oh, you’re going to expect me to back up my criticisms now?

    It’s been a while, and my memories aren’t clear. As I recall, I just didn’t find his characterizations very compelling. The characters didn’t have a lot of life or depth to them.

    In my opinion.

  6. Lars, that sounds reasonable to me. The Darcy books put a lot of work into describing the alternate reality in which they are set and less into helping you care about the characters. I guess it’s too much attention to the novelty and not enough to the meat.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.