I know you’ve been losing sleep, waiting to learn how my Christmas bash went. It went just fine.
We were ten in all at the table, three more than Thanksgiving, which seemed pretty crowded at the time. But ten didn’t seem to crowd the place any more. The youngest niece, who was in Tanzania at Thanksgiving, was with us now, and the oldest niece brought her boyfriend (who passed inspection with flying colors) and his adorable little daughter. Large quantities of food were consumed, and many presents were opened.
Deprived of any disaster to agonize over, I am agonizing over the mistakes I must have made which, I’m confident, people must have kept quiet about, to spare my feelings.
I was going to say something more about the flap raised by talk show host Dennis Prager. Prager has stated that he thinks Congressman Keith Ellison (a Muslim and my soon-to-be congressman, as it happens) ought to have a Bible present at his swearing-in, in recognition of the basic values that have shaped our republic. I’ve already said I disagree with him on this. As far as I understand his argument, it seems he considers the Bible (in that context) a symbolic object, like a flag. I find it hard to take that view.
But former New York mayor Ed Koch has publicly labeled Prager a bigot. This is, frankly, infamous. If there’s a public figure in this country who deserves the label of “bigot” less than Dennis Prager, I can’t think of one offhand.
Prager is my favorite talk show host. And that’s odd in a way, because of all the talk shows I listen to, I probably disagree with his most (except for Michael Savage, but I only listen to Savage while getting ready for bed, as an alternative to lonely silence). I disagree with him on theology (he seems to me a Pharisee in the best sense of the word, understood in its historical context). I disagree with him on “gay” civil unions. And I disagree with him on the issue of heredity.
He was onto heredity today. His view seems to be that, aside from genetic diseases, biological heritage means nothing whatever. Perhaps he’s one of those Jewish people who don’t believe they’re actually descended from Abraham. Or maybe he believes he is and just doesn’t care.
It might be a reaction against the racialism that brought about the Holocaust. It’s easy to understand how a Jew might prefer to hear nothing more about race forever.
But, although it’s a fashionable idea in our time, I do wonder in my secret heart whether race is actually nothing.
Classic racism, it need hardly be said (but I guess I’d better), is complete hogwash. To think that one racial group is “better” or “higher” than another is nonsensical as far as I can see. If experience teaches us anything, it’s that nobody is unqualified for anything in the world on the basis of their race.
But is it purely and solely cultural that Asians, given broad opportunities, still tend (generally) to excel at mathematics and music? That black people run marathons faster than anybody else in the world? That Scandinavians are the world’s chief purveyors of suicide-inducing books and movies?
I have an idea that our current ideas on race stem from a belief, held as a dogma by many, that racism is the root cause of all the evil in the world (just as the Communists used to believe—some still do—that greed is the real source of the poison). I think that’s inadequate. Throughout human history, large portions of the world’s population never saw anyone of a different race in their lives. That didn’t stop the Irish from hating the English, or the Bosnians from hating the Serbs.
And I still don’t understand how the brave new world everyone seems to want—the one where all the colors are mixed and everybody looks Brazilian—will be more beautiful and diverse than the one we’ve got, where you can actually fly to a different country and see people who look different from the folks at home.
Of course, I probably only think these things because I’m a racist.
I’ll go and do my penance now.
I understand nothing about u.s. politics; but it seems to me that if someone can ‘swear’ on the koran, this means the u.s. can become a muslim (Islamic) country. I find this sad; but it seems to me this is the inevitable consequence of so called neutral politics. (I notice no muslim state believes such a thing.)
Technically America can’t be officially anything in a religious sense. Separation of church and state, and all that.
I’m not convinced our Muslim population entirely agrees though.
Interesting times a-coming.
As I understand it, the Constitution doesn’t require congressmen to swear on anything. They must pledge or affirm their loyalty to their office, or something close to that. Using a Bible is cultural, and the law clearly forbids requiring a confession or creedal argeement for anyone in public life.
This is true, and Prager doesn’t dispute it. His view (with which, as I’ve said, I disagree) is that there is a tradition of using a Bible in order to acknowledge the importance of the Bible’s teachings in shaping American values. He does not insist that Ellison swear on the Bible, but thinks that Ellison, as a gesture of respect, ought to have a Bible present, along with the Koran.
The swearing-in being discussed is actually only a photo opportunity. The actual oath is taken in a group, with all the other congressmen. No books are used in that ceremony.
Seems to me the whole thing devolves into some pretty fine hair-splitting.
Hair-splitting is what it looks like to me too. Oh, well. We must argue about something.
Careful there, there are people out there with absolutely no sense of irony who will take you literally when you say things like that.
Oops, I did something in the above comment that your site interpreted as HTML & dropped the quote I was referring to. I was referring to the line, Of course, I probably only think these things because I’m a racist. Without that quote my comment is either confusing or (worse) easily misinterpreted.