With Greater Demand Comes a Higher Price

D.J. Taylor asks why Dan Brown’s new book is so heavily discounted when thousands of people are eager to read it. Why not capitalize on all of the hype by asking readers to pay full or slightly-off-full price? The reason is that the hype and discount will get buyers into the store and maybe, just maybe, they will buy something else. How does that figure, Taylor asks. Won’t it drive the price for other books down?

I agree, and as thrifty buyer (more or less) I balk a paying $25 or more for a book. I remember seeing Robinson’s Gilead in the store after much praise, and I wanted to buy it. I was even a little excited. But I think was priced at $28.00, and it was much smaller than I had imagined. I passed it up.

But Brown’s fans are even less hinged on reality than I am, so make them pay $20 or more for the most anticipated novel of the year. Tell them it sells for $35, but they can get it for $22.50 if they give the secret word. They love stuff like that, and some will even pay $35.

Professionals Thinking Like Sheep

“We like to think of professionals as a cut above the man on the street in terms of their fiduciary responsibility and independence of thought, but sadly it’s often the opposite. Professionals tend to be on average very influenced by social trends and fashions, especially if those fashions influence their ability to continue practicing and be a respected member of the community.”

— Jeffrey Satinover, psychiatrist and author of Homosexuality and the Politics of Truth in World magazine interview last month. Dr. Santinover has come under personal attack for arguing that homosexuality is not genetic and can be overcome. In the interview, he says research articles cited as proof of homosexuality’s permanence completely contradict that assertion. He states, “An objective scientific debate would without question be overwhelmingly won by those who say that homosexuality is primarily environmentally determined.”

The Meme of the Beast, Norwegian edition

OK, Phil, you asked for it.

1. Snag a theology book or a book on religious living. Take no more than six seconds deliberating your choice. Just snag and return.

2. Turn to page 66 and find the sixth sentence.

3. Copy it into your meme post with proper reference.

4. Post your quotation with the introduction and rules on your blog, linking to the post where you first read The Meme of the Beast.

“Thi dette er det absolut nødvendige i en virkelig Frikirke, og der hvor det mangler, er man allerede langt inde i de falske, katholske Spor, som fører til Trælldom.”

(From Professor Georg Sverdrups Samlede Skrifter i Udvalg, Tredie Bind. [The Collected Works of Professor Georg Sverdrup in Selection, Vol. 3].) The English translation (with apologies to our Catholic readers): “For this is the absolutely necessary thing in a truly free church, and wherever it is lacking, we have already gone far along the false, Catholic way which leads to slavery.”

The Meme of the Beast

Friends, you are reading this post because you are predestined to copy the Meme of the Beast. Already, you have passed the point of no return, so here are the rules:

  1. Snag a theology book or a book on religious living. Take no more than six seconds deliberating your choice. Just snag and return.
  2. Turn to page 66 and find the sixth sentence.
  3. Copy it into your meme post with proper reference.
  4. Post your quotation with the introduction and rules on your blog, linking to the post where you first read The Meme of the Beast

“Indeed, I do not hesitate to say that according to the New Testament it is rank heresy to recommend Christian behavior to people who are not Christian.” (Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Life in Christ)

This is an original BwB meme (which explains its triviality). Of course, the quotation is not.

“The Twelve Wild Ducks”

The piece on the philology of folk tales that I linked to this morning reminded me of my reading of Norwegian fairy tales (called “eventyr,” which means “adventure,” more or less). A pair of Norwegians named Asbjørnsen and Moe, disciples of the Grimms, compiled the most famous collection. The familiar English translation is George Dasent’s East o’ the Sun and West o’ the Moon, but I don’t recommend it. It’s not a particularly good translation, and has a very Victorian flavor. This one is better.

My favorite eventyr is “The Twelve Wild Ducks,” which (in line with the interrelations of stories mentioned in that piece below) is clearly (to me at least) a cousin to “Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs.” This is especially apparent at the beginning. However, it’s far longer and more convoluted than the Grimms’ German tale that we all grew up with. It also bears interesting similarities to the classical story of Cupid and Psyche, which means Snow White and Psyche are related at only one remove. I find that intriguing. Continue reading “The Twelve Wild Ducks”

Suffering for the Beauty

Author Ingrid Hill has some remarks on the suffering needed to view the world and the choice of magical realism. “Asked how he developed his magical realist style, García Márquez demurred: it wasn’t a style at all, just his way of articulating how things looked to him as a child. His child-mind took over.” (via Mindy Withrow)

Also from Mindy, a quote from writer Joe Meno on the reality of throwing out most of what you write. “In order to write one good story, you’re going to probably write ten bad ones.”

Courage, friends. Courage.

“Philology of folk tales”

If you’ve read J. R. R. Tolkien’s essay, “On Fairy Stories,” you’re familiar with the fact that folk tales can trace their origins back through millennia and through countless cultures. Stories are adapted by each culture to meet its own peculiar needs, as outlined in this Telegraph.co.uk article.

However, you’ll also recall that Tolkien was very adamant in insisting that the fact that one story is descended from another does not mean they are the same stories.

Tip: Cronaca.

Smart enough

I have to admit I was surprised by the turnout for the 9/12 rallies. I’m not often surprised, expecting the worst as I do, most of the time.

I read a biography of Jefferson (way over my head; I didn’t understand half of it) back when I was in Elementary School. One thing I took away, though, was that Jefferson cherished a basic belief in the wisdom of the people. Let discussion be unfettered; let every party have its say, and the people (he believed) would choose the right argument most of the time.

Lincoln, coming along later, at a time when public debate was the most violent it’s ever been in this country, seemed a little less sanguine, but still generally confident in common sense of the people, when he said (reportedly), “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time. But you can’t fool all of the people all of the time.”

Me, I’ve grown cynical, living in a day when truth has ceased to be even a matter of interest for many of the most respected thinkers in the world. I remember C. S. Lewis’ line from That Hideous Strength—“They have an engine called the Press whereby the people are deceived.” I’ve never used the word “sheeple,” but I’d begun to fear that was what we’d become.

But I read about all those people in Washington D.C. on Saturday, and suddenly I have a little hope. There are (it appears) limits to the amount of nonsense the American people can be force-fed before they react.

Maybe that’s why Minnesota’s so liberal. Maybe we’re just too polite up here to tell our jailers, “You gave us gruel yesterday, and gruel today, and we’re sick of gruel! Especially when you’re billing us for it.”

Book Reviews, Creative Culture