More on CPSIA

Overlawyered has a long list of links for people talking and reporting on the impact of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, which went into effect this week. Even though some of this may be overreaction, congress and the commission are responsible for the confusion. Here’s part of a press release from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, issued last month. I hope this is accurate, not some kind of doublespeak:

The new law requires that domestic manufacturers and importers certify that children’s products made after February 10 meet all the new safety standards and the lead ban. Sellers of used children’s products, such as thrift stores and consignment stores, are not required to certify that those products meet the new lead limits, phthalates standard or new toy standards.

The new safety law does not require resellers to test children’s products in inventory for compliance with the lead limit before they are sold. However, resellers cannot sell children’s products that exceed the lead limit and therefore should avoid products that are likely to have lead content, unless they have testing or other information to indicate the products being sold have less than the new limit. Those resellers that do sell products in violation of the new limits could face civil and/or criminal penalties.

More “guidance” from the commission is here.

Thinkin’ of Lincoln

Lincoln

Today is the 200th anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s birth, and I’d never forgive myself if I didn’t say something about it.

Lincoln was always an important figure to me, even as a kid. All the books about young Lincoln told how he was forever getting in trouble with his father for reading instead of working. I could always identify with that.

Still can.

There’s a strong revisionist movement today, especially among conservatives, to re-define Lincoln as a tyrant, the arch-conspirator who laid the foundations of the imperial federal government, a godless, syphilitic bigot who tromped on civil rights and wasted 600,000 lives in an unconstitutional war.

I understand it, but I don’t buy it. Continue reading Thinkin’ of Lincoln

Quietly Trashing All the Children’s Books

Sherry blogs about the Consumer Products Safety Improvement Act, saying she knows of a used bookstore trashing all of it’s children’s books out of fear of this Improvement Act. I thought second-hand stores, thrift, used, and libraries, were exempt from this act, but even if that’s true, some store owners are not comforted by it.

The CPSC has, as of last week, made an exception for “ordinary children’s books printed after 1985.” Supposedly, some inks used before 1985 may have contained some lead. (However, the eight, nine, or ten year old reading a copy of Winnie the Pooh printed before 1985 would have to eat the book to get get any level of lead into their system. My four to twelve year olds don’t eat books. Do yours?) Right now, the bookstore where my daughter works is getting around the law by reclassifying their children’s books printed before 1985 as “vintage books” for adult collectors. Of course, this strategy is just that, a way of circumventing the law. That 1983 copy of Winnie the Pooh isn’t really vintage or collectible; it also isn’t dangerous to children.

Apparently, youth dirt bikes and ATVS are illegal to sell under the same act. Is the government trying to put small companies and many retailers out of business? It sure seems to be. Do we hate congress enough to rally for mandatory six-month vacations now? The less time they spend in Washington, the better we’ll be.

Honor-Based Liberals

As all my vast literary following is aware, I have a special interest in what Sociologists call (I think) the Honor-Based Culture. I’m not a sociologist of any kind, but I’ve had to try to work out how the mindset works in order to write authentic characters in my Viking novels. It’s a subject of special interest these days, because pretty much all Islamic cultures are honor-based.

I get the impression that when Honor-Based Cultures are discussed, they’re generally treated as if they’re anomalies. Strange plants that grow only under controlled conditions.

I’m coming to believe otherwise. I think the Honor-Based Culture is the default human organizational system. It springs from fallen human nature. It’s what all cultures will be unless they’ve been a) suppressed by a more powerful force, like the Helots under Sparta, or b) transformed through belief, as with Christianity (and Christian culture long retained many elements of the Honor Code nevertheless).

I’m writing all this in order to set up a kind of shocking idea that occurred to me today. I think we’re developing a new Honor Culture.

“How can this be?” you may ask. “Aren’t we trying to suppress violence in every way? Aren’t our Western governments generally doing their best to suppress the carrying of arms, which is central to Honor Cultures?

Well, it’s a new kind of Honor Culture. Follow me closely, and I shall explain all: Continue reading Honor-Based Liberals

School Board Can Remove Pro-Communist Book

Miami-Dade County school libraries had 49 copies of a book praising life in Cuba before the school board voted to get rid of them. The 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower court ruling against the school board, so naturally the usual suspects are upset. I thought this was one of the right ways books could be removed from school libraries, but there’s a supreme court case from 1982 saying, according to the article, a school board does not have “the right to remove books from a school library if the board ‘disliked the ideas contained in it.'”

Really?

Academic Freedom Among Christians

Professor Richard Colling has taught that Christians can believe in evolution too, and he’s still teaching at a Christian college. Can you believe it? I’m kidding, but there were some calling for his dismissal. Apparently, things are working out for Colling now.

Spinning Christian History

The UK’s Channel 4 is running a series on Christian history, and Scottish Pastor Iain Campbell is blogging about it. The first episode argued Christianity was an anti-Semitic invention of the Apostle Paul. Iain writes, “History might demonstrate that some Christians have been against Jews; but the New Testament is decidedly for them. ‘God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew’, says Paul of Israel, and he anticipates a day when they – to quote one of the Hebrew prophets – will look on the one they pierced and mourn for him.”

Another episode tells us how bad the Reformation was and Protestants today [are] a sorry bunch (some Protestants have especially sorry grammar and spelling habits).

Do Not Be Afraid

When speaking up on campus. David French states:

When I speak on campus, one of the most frustrating experiences is hearing conservatives–and many faithful Christians–describe themselves as “silenced” or “afraid” to speak when there is no formal, legal barrier to their speech. . . . I hear these complaints, and don’t doubt their sincerity, but here is what these folks are really saying: “There are many things that I value far more than my conservative (or, sadly, Christian) principles, including the regard of all my peers, the ease of my academic career, and feeling welcome and accepted during the Thursday-Sunday party circuit. Please change the university so that I can speak my mind without any cost or consequence.”

He says it’s especially disappointing for Christians to complain, because the Bible teaches us not to fear such things, even to anticipate a struggle against the world’s wisdom. If God is for us, who can be against? What is light opposition compared to eternal weight of glory?

Book Reviews, Creative Culture