No, the Internet is not for that thing–I don’t even want to type it–but as you’re aware, there is a lot of it out there. That’s at least one reason, maybe the biggest reason, the Playboy company is showing reduced profits. The company produces more than just the magazine, but to focus on that part of it, subscriptions are down to 2.7 million now. Similar magazine appear to be down as well, though there numbers are only in the thousands. As Carl Trueman points out, Playboy’s decline isn’t a reason for cheer. It is only the decline of our popular culture.
Our decline isn’t only that photos from indecent to raunchy are available online for free. It’s also the abundance of celebrity gossip. The other day I was thinking of writing Fox News in an effort to make the case against their celebrity news coverage. Why does it call for so much media attention? I don’t want to see any more headlines about the Pitt-Jolie-Aniston thing. I don’t want to be aware that some actor said something revealing in some interview I would have missed had it not been for news flashes and clumps of headlines on a web page. I saw something about Hugh Hefner losing and regaining a girl to sleep with–that’s nasty. Why is that news?
Most people (87%) appear to agree that we see and hear too much of it, and I think it contributes to the sexualization or maybe the pornographizing of the exposed. Continue reading The Internet is for Gossip