The Art of Maniliness is talking about Viktor Frankl today.
Category Archives: Authors
Klavan on Psychological Crime Novels
From the Wall Street Journal.
Full disclosure: Of the books listed, I’ve only read Crime and Punishment.
Site of first Shakespeare theater found in London
Shakespeare acted himself, and staged his first plays, at a London site which is now being excavated.
The remains of a London theatre where William Shakespeare’s early plays including “Romeo And Juliet” were first performed have been discovered by archaeologists, a museum said Wednesday.
Shakespeare appeared at The Theatre in Shoreditch, east London, as an actor with a troupe called The Lord Chamberlain’s Men, which also performed his efforts as a playwright there.
Full story here.
Commentary Magazine on Solzhenitsyn
Commentary Magazine’s website has several links to reviews of Solzhenitsyn’s work and articles on the man himself. In this blog post, John Podhoretz described Solzhenitsyn’s auto-biography, The Oak and the Calf, as “a book about temptation — the temptation to give in, to let the Soviet censor have his way here and there, to do what will make its author more comfortable even if doing so means bowdlerizing his own unmistakable vision of Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist tyranny. . . . [H]e knew his path was one only a very few could possibly follow, because it required that one’s soul be made of oak, and humans with that kind of solidity come along a few times a century.”
In an essay called “Why Solzhenitsyn Will Not Go Away, Joseph Epstein quotes the author: “In Invisible Allies and The Oak and the Calf he speaks of carrying “the dying wishes of millions whose last whisper, last moan, had been cut short on some hut floor in some prison camp.” And again: “My point of departure [was] that I did not belong to myself alone, that my literary destiny was not just my own, but that of millions who had not lived to scrawl or gasp or croak the truth about their lot as jailbirds.”
Alexander Solzhenitsyn, 1918-2008
We would be greatly remiss not to note the passing of one of the towering figures of the 20th Century, both in literature and in the wider arena of culture: Alexander Solzhenitsyn.
Solzhenitsyn turned unbelievable suffering into vital art, and through that art helped to bring an end to a mighty evil in the world. Exiled to America, he found this country a deep disappointment. When he addressed students at Harvard on the subject of good and evil, he was booed. Yet he persevered, and triumphed. He was a Christian, of the Orthodox faith.
He wrote in The Gulag Archipelago:
Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either, but right through every human heart, and through all human hearts. This line shifts. Inside us, it oscillates with the years. Even within hearts overwhlemed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained; and even in the best of all hearts, there remains a small corner of evil.
First Things Interviews Anne Rice
Father Dwight Longenecker over at First Things interviews author Anne Rice today on her journey from darkness toward the Light.
Arthur C. Clarke’s Final Novel
Frederik Pohl has collaborated with Arthur C. Clarke on the latter author’s final novel, The Last Theorem. It will be released August 5.
Clarke is known for predicting scientific inventions in his novels: In 1945, he predicted the invention of communications satellites, 12 years before the launch of the first artificial satellites. As a result, geosynchronous orbits, which keep satellites in a fixed position relative to the ground, are nicknamed Clarke orbits.
“The Last Theorem” includes a weapon called Silent Thunder that neutralizes all electronic activity in a given area to harmlessly disarm entire nations. Another is the space elevator, a cord suspended from an orbiting object in space that can pull objects from Earth, rather than rely on rocket power to launch them.
Pohl said his research and conversations with friends who are scientists convince him both will one day exist.
“If we can somehow figure out what possible futures there might be,” he said, “you can try to encourage the ones you like and avoid the ones you don’t.”
Pohl said the type of work he and Clarke did was different from much of what is written today. He said that rather than delving into difficult subjects like astronomy, math and physics, young writers sometimes turn to an easier route by writing fantasy.
“Science fiction is sometimes a little hard,” Pohl said. “Fantasy is like eating an ice cream cone. You don’t have to think a bit.”
I can understand that, but you don’t have to think much about fantasy only if you aren’t trying to hold to an actual historic time and place. And you don’t have to think much if you aren’t developing/creating much detail in your fantasy world.
Heroes aren’t always nice guys
According to a report in the London Telegraph (via Conservative Grapevine), a former Special Branch policeman who helped guard Salman Rushdie says in his newly published autobiograpy that the author is such a jerk that his guards once locked him in a cupboard so they could spend a night out in a pub.
If there’s a lesson here, I fail to discern it. Other than that people are extremely complex organisms.
Throw Them From the Balloon
So Homer, Austen, Voltaire, and Wodehouse are in a sinking hot air balloon, arguing over who needs to be pitched in order to save the rest. What is this world coming to, I ask you? (via Books, Inq.)
Repost: Grand Klavan
(Note: Phil has suggested that, in honor of Andrew Klavan’s new release, Empire of Lies (which I’m reading now with great pleasure), I should repost my previous reviews on his work. That sounds like a very wise and thoughtful suggestion, but–more important–it means less work for me. So herewith, from my entry for May 16, 2006 on the old blog site, is my first Klavan review. This one concentrates on his blockbusters, True Crime and Don’t Say a Word.)
Back in the 90s I discovered an excellent mystery writer named Keith Peterson. His novels about reporter John Wells were exciting and smart, but the thing I really loved about them was that Peterson created characters I could really care about. I think I’ve said this before (and I’m sure I’ll say it again) but sympathetic characters are the thing I most require in a book.
Then Peterson just disappeared. (Actually there were a couple more Peterson books, but I missed them). I looked wistfully now and then at my John Wells novels, which I’d hung on to.
Recently I did a web search on Keith Peterson and made a wonderful discovery. Keith Peterson was a nom de plume for Andrew Klavan, the big thriller writer.
That took me to the used bookstore, and… wow. I mean, wow. Continue reading Repost: Grand Klavan