For many years, I’ve declared Bill Forsyth’s Local Hero my favorite movie. There are other films I enjoy very much, and sometimes my moods change, but I tend to return in the end to Local Hero for its scenic Scottish setting, understated humor, gorgeous music, and fish out of water point of view.
Thanks to recommendations, I’ve found a movie that belongs next to Local Hero on the conceptual shelf. Fisherman’s Friends, a popular romantic comedy that a number of you have probably already seen. Still, a movie isn’t really complete until I’ve passed judgment on it, right?
The story is a highly fictionalized account of the rise of Fisherman’s Friends, an all-male folk singing group from Port Isaac, Cornwall that specializes in sea shanties (my kind of music, by the way).
As the film tells it, the story begins with a group of London music producer buddies who travel to Cornwall, where one of them is being married. They happen to hear this local shanty group, and our hero Danny Anderson (Daniel Mays) is challenged by his boss to sign the group to a recording contract. He’s not aware it’s all a gag, and when his buddies leave him high and dry in the town, he sets about getting the fishermen’s agreement – which is hard, because they cherish a dearly bought mistrust of outsiders. By the time Danny learns he’s been made a fool of, he has come to value the fishermen’s trust and is falling for a local girl, so he sets about making the big deal on his own.
The rest of the story is pretty much what you’d expect, and you’d be disappointed if it weren’t. It’s well done, and funny, and moving, and I’m pretty sure you’ll like it.
I saw a whole lot of references to Local Hero in this production – I can’t document it, but I strongly suspect they used it for a model – and they couldn’t have made a better choice.
When I’ve talked with people who don’t like Local Hero, I’ve often gotten the comment that they don’t like the ending. They find it a downer. I think at this point the difference may be one of experience. The ending of Local Hero is how things tend to end in my life; there’s a kind of sad comfort for me in it, a feeling that I’m not alone because Peter Riegert’s character is in the same place.
Most viewers will certainly prefer the very different ending of Fisherman’s Friends.
Waking Ned Devine should be on your list as well.
That’s one I’ve seen. Good movie. I heard someone say he wanted to see it in Christological terms, but thought he was reading into it too much. I don’t think it makes much sense without a Christology in the background.
Clearly someone dying so those folks could split a fortune could not be in the realm of Christology!
I can’t tell if you’re agreeing with me or not, but the idea is Christ’s riches given to us through his death. There’s more to it than that. I think a big thing for me is the dialogue at the end. It makes absolutely no sense unless you’re interpret it as a picture of Christ. I forget the details so I can’t repeat them.
I realize I responded hastily. Christ figures occur frequently in literature, plays, movies. That one scene is the only one I remember from the entire film.
The climax where the lady who was ready to disclose the passing of one Ned Devine gets run off a cliff accidentally is what we are referring to. The villagers split the jackpot at her expense.
I was referring to the young woman who says she had pregnant from Ned. I forget the details, but what she says is outrageous and yet the main old chogger talking to her takes it as the most natural thing. That’s what I meant by only making sense in one way, but maybe I’m reading into it.