I came up with a one-liner today that is, in my opinion, hilarious. It’s so good that I’m positive somebody else must have come up with it first.
“I’d give my right arm to be ambidextrous.”
Thank you, thank you. I’ll be here all week.
My big entertainment, over the weekend, was watching all three Man With No Name movies on Blu-ray. I’ve had a Blu-ray player for several months now, but I didn’t actually own a Blu-ray movie. Finally I noticed that Amazon was selling a set of all three Eastwood spaghettis for about twenty-five bucks, so I sent away for them.
Consumer report: I enjoyed the movies very much, as I always do. But I realized more than ever before – I suppose it’s inevitable as I grow older – that there is no moral value in them whatever. I first encountered the term “moral holiday” in a review of a James Bond movie when I was a teenager, and that conception applies just as well to Sergio Leone’s westerns. They’re works of art, and sometimes breathtaking. But they do not know good from evil.
They think they do. I’m sure director Leone thought he was teaching a moral lesson to the world with his works. He loved westerns – it’s apparent in every frame – but he did not love America. Part of the mystique of the spaghetti western was the suggestion that these movies were more honest than the older movies. The old movies had sugar-coated the hard truth, turning gunfighters into boy scouts. But now we could see the true motivations – hatred, revenge, and especially pure greed.
In fact this was no more realistic than the earlier westerns. If the traditional American oaters romanticized the cowboy and the shootist, the Italian westerns imposed on them a purely modern, amoral sensibility. You can see that in the frequency of violence against women in the Italian movies. In the real American west, violence against women (at least white women) was among the chief taboos. These were Victorians, after all, not members of the Manson family.
But Leone knew how to make a film, and he hired one of the greatest geniuses in film music, Ennio Morricone, to do the sound tracks. The result is pure entertainment, the kind of alteration of consciousness that only a master epic filmmaker can produce.
Just as Leone “tore the mask” off the American cowboy, I shall here tear the mask off the moviemaker – moviemakers are manipulators. They always stack the decks, for good or ill. Understand that and you’re free to have a good time.
Applies equally to novelists, come to think of it.
You’ve pretty much hit the nail on the head, Lars. Leone was a man of his generation, to an extent. Consider the rise of the American antihero and the string of genre revisionists who liked to posit that the bad guys weren’t so bad because the good guys weren’t so good: think Bonnie & Clyde, the Wild Bunch, The Godfather, Chinatown.(Is Travis Bickle a good guy or a bad guy? What do those modifiers even mean in the world of Taxi Driver?)
The aesthetic was everything–for example, in Leone’s films the famous wedding of familiar western horizon with ludicrous closeup, warts and all. (Eastwood had one of these Leone shots in several of the films he directed–think A Perfect World.)
And you’re right: understand what the filmmakers were rebelling against (hypocrisy and mythmaking) and appreciate their gifts as storytellers and moving-picture painters — but leave the relativistic worldview where it belongs, on the cutting room floor.
Always nice to hear agreement from somebody who knows what he’s talking about.
Sure enjoyed this piece about the Eastwood movies.
Google says that quote can first be attributed to Yogi Berra, but other sources seem to call it ‘unattributed.’
It’s a good one, though.
I think the common wisdom is that good writers borrow from others. Great writers steal.
Not that I’m saying anything.