We’re celebrating Banned Books Week here on BwB. For the readers at home, the word “banned” means complained about at any time during the life of the book by anyone, especially conservatives or The Religious. The American Library Association reminds us that “closing books shuts our ideas.”

Yes, you can nod your head on that cue.

But lest you feel smug in your cozy little home, we must remind you that the book you put down to check up on this blog is likely to be a banned book. You too have been effected, wounded, struck by the enemy of knowledge and clean-living–namely your local librarian.

The American Thinker describes the tyranny of the American library system and the fact that 99% of all books are banned even as we read this.

When you choose what books go into a library, you are also choosing what books will not go into that library, since you simply can’t fit them all in. So why are librarians considered the one and only ones who can make such decisions? Concerned citizens can’t. Parents of children who use the school library can’t. The mayor, or any other elected official, can’t. Not ever. No way. No how. That’s censorship. But librarians not only do it, they do it every day. It’s considered their job.

The real question is not which books should be stocked and not stocked at your local library, but who decides.

It’s the start of Banned Books Week, kids, and the candidate of the future has joined in the fun. Apparently, Obama supports censorship. In Missouri, the Obama campaign has asked state officials “to target anyone who lies or runs a misleading television ad during the presidential campaign.” Now, who could argue with this. I mean everyone agrees on what “misleading” is in any given situation. (via View from the Foothills)

Paul Newman has died of cancer at age 83. (HT: Terry Teachout)

I’ve been listening to people on talk radio for a couple days now, discussing the market bailout bill being discussed in Washington.

I’ve come to the solid conviction that I don’t understand it at all, and have no idea who’s right.

I think I vaguely comprehend the problem, and how the situation came to be. But what may be the right way to deal with it I cannot fathom, any more than I grasp quantum physics or pop music.



Apropos of Phil’s post below on the movie Fireproof, here’s a link that was sent to me, to Ted Baehr’s Movie Guide webcast, where they interview Kirk Cameron about the film. I share it primarily because the interviewer, Gail Nordskog, is the wife of my new publisher. (I suspect, due to the nature of the URL, that this link will change to a newer webcast before too long. So if you’re reading this a few days from now, you may get a different program.)



Do any of you know anything about the new Billy Graham movie? This isn’t a movie by Billy Graham (i.e., World Wide Pictures), but a movie about Billy Graham. I watched the trailer (someplace), and I find it intriguing. But it seems too good to be true. Continue reading Markets and movies →